An 83-year-old Colorado fisherman has resurrected his 12-year struggle for public freedom to wade within the state’s rivers, looking for arrest and risking conflicts with landowners by returning to a contested bend within the Arkansas River.
Roger Hill hiked throughout federally managed public land to enter the river, donned his straw hat, and solid his dry-fly line alongside that privately owned stretch final weekend with out incident. This week, he urged different anglers statewide to copy his civil disobedience and assert a public proper to fish and float on navigable rivers — a freedom established in different western states.
It’s the newest twist in a struggle that started in the summertime of 2012 on this similar stretch of the Arkansas River, simply upriver from the confluence with Texas Creek close to Cotopaxi. A landowner threw baseball-sized rocks at Hill, forcing him to go away. A number of years later, her husband fired pictures at Hill’s buddy. A retired physicist from Colorado Springs, Hill filed a lawsuit claiming a public proper to wade on riverbeds — and received — till landowners, with help from Colorado Lawyer Common Phil Weiser, appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court docket. Excessive courtroom judges in June 2023 dismissed Hill’s case, ruling that he lacked authorized standing to proactively sue to determine a public proper to wade in streams and rivers.
The ruling means Hill can’t advance his authorized case except he can elevate the general public entry subject as a protection.
He had notified the Fremont County sheriff earlier than he went fishing final Saturday, assuming an arrest or ticket for trespassing would give him the authorized standing the state Supreme Court docket has required to have the core of his case heard.
“I didn’t catch a single fish and I’m pissed off that I wasn’t arrested,” Hill stated. “Any individual’s received to do it…. Energy in numbers would assist.”
“He must cease or undergo the results,” stated James Gibson, an proprietor of property the place Hill fished. “If he’s not breaking the legislation, there’s nothing to be carried out. I hope this will get settled.”
Fremont County Sheriff’s Cpl. Caleb Chase stated the county would depart any enforcement to Colorado Parks and Wildlife, a part of the state authorities. At CPW, a spokesman stated the company oversees fish however lacks jurisdiction over water and land adjoining to Colorado’s streams and rivers.
Colorado’s AG Weiser declined to remark.
Colorado authorities permit personal possession of riverbeds whereas different states, together with Montana, New Mexico, and Nevada, deal with rivers deemed “navigable” at statehood as public. However leisure actions, together with fishing and whitewater rafting, more and more play a main position within the state’s financial system and pressure Colorado’s place as an outlier. The U.S. Supreme Court docket has dominated that states maintain possession of navigable riverbeds in belief for the general public. Public entry has grow to be a vexing subject as rich landowners buy extra property alongside the West’s mountain streams and rivers.
This time, Colorado Backcountry Hunters and Anglers co-chairman Don Holmstrom joined Hill in fishing alongside the Arkansas, the place trappers and railroad firms within the 1870s used the river for the business functions of transporting pelts and tens of 1000’s of railroad ties.
“Roger Hill is a hero,” stated Holmstrom, who has helped foyer for an intervention by Gov. Jared Polis to designate public-access waterways. The growing buy-ups of riverside property within the West “makes it a struggle for the general public curiosity versus these rich landowners who’re preventing in opposition to the general public curiosity,” he stated. “These are public pathways all through the state that individuals ought to be capable of take pleasure in — to fish, float and run the whitewater. ”
College of Colorado legislation professor Mark Squillace, who has helped signify Hill, stated the state Supreme Court docket dismissal over authorized standing misinterpreted well-established rules. “You don’t must put your self in hurt’s manner in an effort to check your authorized rights.” He has criticized state leaders for siding with riverside landowners.
“Folks ought to train their proper to make use of the beds of navigable streams,” Squillace stated. “Until we will get someone arrested or ticketed, or one thing, we don’t have a solution to get into courtroom.”
Landowners stated they have been conscious of Hill’s defiant fishing final weekend. They’d assumed the Supreme Court docket dismissal ended the struggle.
“We personal the river backside,” stated Earl Pfeiffer, a resident since 2010. “Basically, what these guys are asking is that the state takes possession of the land. If the federal government needs to take it, now we have to determine a solution to be compensated for that. I might somewhat not deed it over to the state,” he stated.
He and his spouse take pleasure in sitting at their home simply 35 toes above the water because it flows.
“It’s entertaining for us to sit down up on our deck and watch folks fishing,” Pfeiffer stated. “If folks wish to fish, we aren’t going to cease them – except they’re actually rowdy, making a large number, throwing rubbish. It could be nice in the event that they’d ask permission. We aren’t right here to present anyone a tough time.”
Get extra Colorado information by signing up for our day by day Your Morning Dozen electronic mail publication.
Initially Revealed: