Actor Kunickaa Sadanand just lately opened up about her perspective on relationships, making it clear that informal flings and one-night stands usually are not one thing she resonates with.
In a world the place trendy relationship dynamics have advanced to incorporate phrases like ‘situationships’ and ‘buddies with advantages,’ Kunickaa, who just lately admitted that she dated singer Kumar Sanu, prefers a extra conventional strategy — one that’s rooted in long-term dedication and emotional funding.
Talking in Hindi throughout an interview with Hindi Rush, she shared, “I’ve by no means checked out a relationship as a one-night stand or a fling. Each relationship I’ve had in my life, I’ve all the time envisioned a future for it and dreamed about it. I don’t perceive ideas like one-night stands, buddies with advantages, or situationships as a result of, in a means, you’re throwing your self into one thing with out that means.”
She continued, “Fundamental apne physique ko, apne mann ko, apne dil ko itna respect karti hu ki predominant uska iss tarah se misuse nahi kar sakti. Aur agar I’m in it, then it needs to be for a future. Aur yeh unhappy chiz hai ki nahi ho paaya, aur rishta jitna bhi dinn chala sab bahut acha acha yaadein de kar gaye hain. Unn yaadon ke sahare bhi jee sakti hu. (I respect my physique, my thoughts, and my coronary heart a lot that I can’t misuse them in that means. If I’m in it, then it needs to be for a future. It’s unlucky that issues didn’t work out, however irrespective of how lengthy the connection lasted, it left me with stunning recollections. And even these recollections are sufficient for me to stay by.)”
Her assertion sparks an attention-grabbing dialogue on how people understand intimacy and relationships — whether or not as a long-term dedication or a momentary connection.
Psychological elements that affect whether or not somebody prefers long-term relationships over informal flings or one-night stands
Psychologist Rasshi Gurnani explains that whether or not somebody prefers long-term relationships or informal flings is dependent upon their character, emotional experiences, and attachment model.
“Individuals who grew up with secure, nurturing bonds typically search for dedicated relationships, seeing intimacy as emotionally significant. Alternatively, these with a extra avoidant attachment model might lean towards informal encounters, valuing independence over emotional closeness,” she says.
Private values additionally play a big function — some people naturally search deeper connections, whereas others benefit from the pleasure of fleeting experiences. Gurnani provides that hormones like oxytocin, which promotes bonding, can draw some people to lasting relationships extra.
Story continues under this advert
“Ultimately, all of it comes all the way down to a mixture of emotional wiring and life experiences,” she notes.
How does private notion of self-worth and physique autonomy form one’s strategy to intimacy?
When Kunickaa says she will be able to’t see her physique in a transactional means, it displays her robust sense of self-worth and emotional boundaries.
“Folks with wholesome vanity typically view intimacy as one thing significant, tied to belief and connection, slightly than simply bodily gratification,” Gurnani explains.
Conversely, these with decrease self-worth might typically search informal encounters for non permanent validation. Physique autonomy additionally performs an enormous function — when individuals really feel in command of their bodily and emotional boundaries, they make extra considerate and genuine decisions about intimacy.
Story continues under this advert
Gurnani highlights that “seeing the physique as extra than simply bodily however as a part of one’s emotional and non secular self, typically results in a extra intentional and aware strategy to relationships.”