In a major transfer to curb malpractice in postgraduate medical admissions, the Supreme Courtroom has directed all non-public and deemed universities to reveal charges previous to NEET-PG counselling. This determination comes amid rising considerations over the widespread follow of seat blocking, which the apex courtroom mentioned undermines advantage and transparency.
A bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, in an order dated April 29, strongly criticised the follow, highlighting its detrimental affect on the equity of the admissions course of. “Seat blocking will not be merely an remoted wrongdoing – it displays deeper systemic flaws rooted in fragmented governance, lack of transparency, and weak coverage enforcement,” the bench noticed.
The courtroom acknowledged that whereas regulators have tried to introduce technical safeguards and penalties, key points like synchronisation of counselling, real-time seat visibility, and uniform enforcement stay largely unresolved. “Though regulatory our bodies have launched disincentives and technical controls, the core challenges of synchronisation, real-time visibility, and uniform enforcement stay largely unaddressed,” the order famous.
Stressing the necessity for structural reform, the bench added, “Attaining a really truthful and environment friendly system would require greater than coverage tweaks; it calls for structural coordination, technological modernisation, and strong regulatory accountability at each state and Central ranges.”
To handle these challenges, the Supreme Courtroom ordered the implementation of a nationally synchronised counselling calendar. This measure goals to align All India Quota and state counselling rounds to curb seat blocking and guarantee a degree taking part in subject for all candidates.
The courtroom additionally added, “Mandate pre-counselling price disclosure by all non-public/deemed universities, detailing tuition, hostel, warning deposit, and miscellaneous fees. Set up a centralised price regulation framework below the Nationwide Medical Fee.”
In an extra effort to tighten the method, the bench known as for stringent penalties towards seat blocking. “Implement strict penalties for seat blocking together with forfeiture of safety deposit, disqualification from future NEET-PG exams and blacklisting complicit schools,” it mentioned.
Story continues beneath this advert
Moreover, the courtroom permitted the introduction of improve home windows after the second counselling spherical. This could enable admitted candidates to shift to higher seats with out reopening the method to new entrants. For elevated transparency, the courtroom additionally directed authorities to “Publish uncooked scores, reply keys and normalisation formulae for transparency in multi-shift NEET-PG exams.”
The ruling was issued in response to a petition by the Uttar Pradesh authorities and the Director Common of Medical Schooling & Coaching, Lucknow. That they had challenged a 2018 order from the Allahabad Excessive Courtroom, which had directed compensation for 2 NEET-PG candidates and motion towards seat blocking.
© The Indian Categorical Pvt Ltd