IonQ, Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and Quantum Computing have reached valuation ranges effectively past these seen throughout prior inventory market bubbles.
Every of those firms has lately raised capital by a sequence of fairness choices and inventory issuances.
These strikes may counsel that the valuation ranges for these companies aren’t solely abnormally excessive, however unsustainable.
These 10 shares may mint the subsequent wave of millionaires ›
Final summer season, firms akin to IonQ(NYSE: IONQ), Rigetti Computing(NASDAQ: RGTI), D-Wave Quantum(NYSE: QBTS), and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT) have been unknown penny shares.
Nevertheless, as quantum computing steadily made its manner towards middle stage within the synthetic intelligence (AI) realm, every of those firms witnessed meteoric rises of their share costs. During the last 12 months, IonQ inventory has blasted greater by 517%, whereas Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing have skilled surges of not less than 1,500% as of this writing (July 21).
With valuations reaching traditionally excessive ranges, may traders be on the verge of witnessing a quantum computing bubble bursting?
The chart beneath illustrates valuation tendencies amongst standard quantum computing shares on a price-to-sales (P/S) foundation.
IONQ PS Ratio information by YCharts.
As I outlined in a previous article, the quantum computing shares above are buying and selling at far greater P/S multiples in comparison with ranges seen in the course of the dot-com and COVID-19 inventory bubbles.
For instance, in the course of the web increase within the late Nineteen Nineties, shares akin to Amazon, Cisco, and Microsoft skilled peak P/S ratios within the vary of 30x and 40x. Taking this a step additional, standard COVID shares akin to Zoom Communications and Peloton noticed P/S multiples prime out at 124x and 20x, respectively.
The large theme right here is that IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing are every buying and selling for valuation multiples that may very well be seen as traditionally excessive, even when in comparison with prior bubble occasions.
With that stated, different AI firms which are additionally exploring quantum computing — akin to Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft — at present commerce for far more affordable valuation multiples when in comparison with the businesses within the chart above.
Because of this, I don’t suppose your complete quantum computing panorama is vulnerable to experiencing a bubble-bursting occasion. Nevertheless, IonQ and its friends have been dropping some breadcrumbs in latest months that lead me to suppose the smaller quantum computing gamers may very well be on the verge of a harsh sell-off.
Picture supply: Getty Photographs.
After some digging into sure filings with the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC), I believe IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave, and Quantum Computing could also be making an attempt to sign some vital issues to traders:
In February, IonQ introduced that it deliberate to lift as much as $500 million by a sequence of inventory issuances. The corporate doubled down on its capital-raising ambitions extra lately, providing 14,165,708 shares at a worth of $55.49 — elevating practically $1 billion within the course of.
In June, Rigetti raised $350 million in capital after finishing an at-the-market (ATM) fairness providing.
Between June 11 and June 27, D-Wave Quantum raised $400 million by an ATM providing. Of word: This adopted a previous increase of $150 million that occurred in January.
In late June, Quantum Computing raised $200 million following the issuance of 14 million shares at a mean worth of $14.25.
What’s actually occurring right here? With every of those quantum computing shares buying and selling close to all-time highs, it seems to me that administration is trying to make the most of frothy market situations.
IONQ information by YCharts.
Quantum computing is a research-heavy, capital-intensive business. Administration at IonQ and its friends certainly perceive this, and so I see these capital raises as a calculated transfer to capitalize on inflated, overstretched valuations.
To me, any trace of a bubble surrounding IonQ and its smaller friends might already be within the means of bursting. Underneath the floor, the assorted inventory issuances and fairness choices annotated above may counsel that administration doesn’t consider present worth ranges are sustainable.
Through the use of the dot-com and COVID bubbles as benchmarks, historical past would counsel {that a} main correction may very well be on the horizon for these small quantum computing shares. Issuing inventory to lift funds will not be sustainable in the long term. Moreover, constantly diluting shareholders by these choices may name into query how these firms are allocating capital.
In my eyes, if traders are looking for publicity to the quantum computing business, they’re greatest off exploring extra diversified alternatives in large tech versus the smaller, extra speculative gamers analyzed on this piece.
The Motley Idiot’s analysts are monitoring a large shift in U.S. tech. Over $1.5 trillion is already flowing into infrastructure, AI, and superior manufacturing… and the quantity retains climbing.
Following a serious tariff coverage shift, a brand new AI Gold Rush is taking form, and we expect the actual winner is an organization 1/a hundredth the scale of NVIDIA.
It builds the tech infrastructure that Apple, OpenAI, and others out of the blue can’t dwell with out. We simply launched a full write-up on this under-the-radar inventory — and why now may be the precise second to maneuver.
Proceed »
*Inventory Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Idiot has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Cisco Techniques, Microsoft, Nvidia, Peloton Interactive, and Zoom Communications. The Motley Idiot recommends the next choices: lengthy January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and brief January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Idiot has a disclosure coverage.
May a Quantum Computing Bubble Be About to Pop? Historical past Gives a Clear Reply was initially printed by The Motley Idiot
