Garth Brooks has declared he fears God will banish him to hell for not doing sufficient with the success and wealth generated by his decades-long music profession, because the nation star continues to be rocked by an unresolved civil authorized battle over a rape allegation he has repeatedly denied.
RadarOnline.com can reveal the 64-year-old singer, one of many best-selling recording artists in historical past, opened up about his private doubts throughout a brand new interview whereas authorized proceedings involving sexual assault and rape allegations stay lively in federal courts in California and Mississippi.
Brooks has denied all allegations made by a former hair and make-up artist, who filed a civil lawsuit towards him in October 2024 beneath the pseudonym Jane Roe.
No legal fees have been filed, and each civil circumstances stay ongoing.
Talking about his fortune, estimated at round $400million, Brooks stated a lot of his wealth had been used to assist his household, together with his dad and mom and three daughters.
He stated, “Cash is the best present as a result of it permits you to make another person comfortable. I can purchase land so my women can journey their horses. I can ensure that their mom will get every part she needs for. My first hit album took care of my mother and pa.”
However Brooks pressured monetary success had not eradicated his considerations about whether or not he had made the many of the alternatives he had been given.
“I attempt to have just a few phrases with the person upstairs earlier than falling asleep,” he continued. “Typically I fear that I will hell as a result of I by no means really feel I’ve executed sufficient with the unimaginable items that he is given me.
“But when I do get up tomorrow, hey, it is one other alternative to like any individual and to dream.”
Brooks has three grown-up daughters – Taylor, August, and Allie – along with his ex-wife, Sandy Mahl, and is at the moment married to fellow nation singer Trisha Yearwood.
A music insider stated Brooks’ feedback mirrored a longstanding trait within the singer’s character.
They instructed us, “Regardless of every part he has achieved, Garth has at all times pushed himself tougher than most individuals round him. The sensation that he may have executed extra is one thing he has talked about privately for years.”
The remarks got here as Brooks stays embroiled in a posh authorized dispute stemming from allegations made by a former worker. The girl alleges Brooks raped her in a Los Angeles lodge room in 2019 and subjected her to sexual harassment.
Brooks has strongly denied the claims and has characterised them as an tried extortion scheme.
A authorized supply following the proceedings stated: “The litigation stays in a procedural part, with disputes over jurisdiction, anonymity, and court docket filings slowing progress. Neither aspect has secured a last ruling on the underlying claims.”
Brooks filed a lawsuit in Mississippi shortly earlier than the lady’s criticism was filed in California. Court docket proceedings have since concerned disputes over sealed information and whether or not the accuser ought to be permitted to proceed utilizing a pseudonym.
All through the authorized battle, Brooks has acquired public assist from his spouse, Yearwood, 61, whom he married in 2005.
She not too long ago mirrored on the foundations of their almost two-decade marriage, explaining that spending time collectively had been important to its success.
Yearwood stated, “After I married Garth, and I moved to Oklahoma, I ended. I wasn’t touring 200 days a yr anymore.
“I used to be a bonus mother to a few youngsters, and I used to be making an attempt to make a wedding work, as a result of I had realized that marriages do not work when you’re by no means collectively. That is form of essential. You must be collectively. I made a acutely aware effort to be there, to go to soccer video games and prepare dinner dinner.”
The litigation surrounding Brooks consists of two competing lawsuits – one filed by the enduring singer and one filed by his accuser, each of which have confronted lengthy delays resulting from procedural disputes and sealed court docket information.
In October 2024, a former hair and make-up artist, submitting beneath the pseudonym ‘Jane Roe,’ sued Brooks in California state court docket.
Her lawsuit alleges Brooks raped her in a Los Angeles lodge room in Could 2019 throughout a visit for a Grammy tribute efficiency.
She additionally accused him of ongoing sexual harassment, groping, and sending express textual content messages. The case was later transferred to California federal court docket.
Simply earlier than Jane Roe filed her criticism, Brooks filed a pre-emptive, nameless lawsuit towards her within the Mississippi federal court docket.
He strongly denies all allegations, calling them a “shakedown” and extortion scheme designed to drive him into paying thousands and thousands of {dollars} to guard his popularity.
Shortly after Jane Roe went public together with her lawsuit, Brooks amended his Mississippi submitting to publicly identify the accuser.
Her authorized workforce harshly criticized the transfer, calling it a malicious act of spite. Brooks’ workforce countered that her id was already successfully compromised by means of media profiles and particulars in her personal submitting.
Following the general public unmasking and subsequent back-and-forth motions, the federal court docket sealed the filings within the Mississippi case, protecting most particular proof and updates hidden from public view.
The California case stays formally on maintain whereas the court docket determines methods to proceed with the Mississippi case.
Brooks’ accuser beforehand filed a movement to have Brooks’ Mississippi swimsuit dismissed or moved, however the court docket dominated that her preliminary movement was moot, which means the hitmaker’s extortion lawsuit is legally permitted to proceed.
The authorized battle has reached a standstill over preliminary points, reminiscent of an appeals court docket denying an expedited request on whether or not the accuser can legally preserve her anonymity transferring ahead.
No legal fees have been filed, and each civil circumstances stay unresolved.