Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) provided head-scratching logic on Thursday when she argued that the U.S. shouldn’t present humanitarian help to girls and youngsters in Afghanistan as a result of it’s not talked about within the Structure.
Luna delivered the baffling line of reasoning throughout Home debate over an modification to the Nationwide Protection Authorization Act that will intestine funding for Afghan help.
Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), who launched the modification, argued the funding might be supporting the brutal Taliban regime.
Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.) voiced “sturdy opposition” to the measure, noting that it “ties the administration’s arms in the way it can finest help the individuals of Afghanistan residing below Taliban rule.”
“It prohibits the usage of any funds approved through this invoice for use, even tangentially, to assist in our help of the hundreds of thousands of Afghan girls and ladies struggling below Taliban rule,” she mentioned, “or to these Afghans residing in poverty and in want of humanitarian aid.”
Following Kamlager-Dove’s fiery pushback, Luna provided her two cents.
“I couldn’t assist however pull out my pocket Structure, and I couldn’t appear to seek out anyplace in right here the place it says we have to fund applications for humanitarian help for ladies and youngsters in Afghanistan,” Luna mentioned. “So with that, I simply wished to level that out and I yield my time.”
Kamlager-Dove had solely a short response: “The textual content is just not within the Structure. It’s within the invoice.”
Social media customers identified a bunch of different stuff that’s not within the Structure: