New Delhi: If all of the votes of non-BJP candidates, independents, and NOTA had been added up as one block, the BJP would have nonetheless gained 224 seats in 2019 — solely 48 wanting the bulk mark, an evaluation by ThePrint exhibits.
In over half of the 436 constituencies the place it was within the fray, the BJP secured greater than 50 per cent of the vote share. Actually, the 224 seats that the BJP gained by this huge vote share, is the very best for any single social gathering since 1984.
Notably, solely 136 BJP MPs secured a 50 per cent vote share or extra within the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. The social gathering has since not solely upped its tally of seats with this vote share but in addition registered such wins throughout a wider geographical unfold.
For many who are envisioning a large coalition to tackle the BJP within the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, due to this fact, the problem appears large. Nevertheless, members of opposition events — 15 of which met in Patna Friday to chalk out a joint technique — declare that such numbers don’t inform the entire story.
Political analysts who spoke to ThePrint took this view too.
India follows a first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system — the place the candidate with essentially the most votes wins no matter whether or not they have a majority — so vote share solely has a restricted relevance, stated political scientist Suhas Palshikar.
“In our FPTP system, a candidate profitable by greater than 50 per cent votes in a constituency doesn’t imply a lot past the native recognition of the candidate or social gathering. But when such constituencies improve in numbers, as within the case of BJP in 2019, it absolutely underscores a rising hegemony of that social gathering,” Palshikar instructed ThePrint.
He added, nonetheless, that vote shares in gross percentages can solely obtain a lot, and events are effectively conscious of this.
“To win extra seats, a celebration doesn’t need to register solely total improve in vote share however a extra systematic strategising about getting sufficient votes in constituencies the place they misplaced by small margins. Most events are conscious of this and attend up to now,” he stated.
Based on him, the BJP should carry out a balancing act with a view to retain its strongholds whereas additionally upping its tally in different areas the place it has much less of a grip.
“The best way BJP is elevating the pitch on emotive points won’t essentially find yourself reaching this. It now has a core constituency in numerous areas or areas. Getting good-looking victories there, with big margins, could demoralise the native opposition however won’t assist in growing numbers of seats gained,” Palshikar stated.
He identified that deep-support constituencies and marginal-support constituencies could have very completely different expectations, posing a quandary for the BJP.
“The previous would anticipate extra symbolic, shrill, anti-Muslim insurance policies and safety for vigilante motion. However marginal help constituencies would anticipate extra mundane issues comparable to infrastructure and improvement,” he stated.
Additionally Learn: BJP gained 105 LS seats by 3 lakh+ votes in 2019, up from 42 in 2014. What it might imply for 2024
Votes vs seats, & brilliant spot for opposition?
Between the final two Lok Sabha election years, the variety of BJP MPs securing victories with a vote share of over 50 per cent witnessed a considerable surge, rising by 88 from 136 to 224.
In distinction, the BJP’s improve within the total seat tally was extra modest, rising by a rely of 21 from 282 in 2014 to 303 in 2019.
What explains this? Based on political analysts, the substantial rise within the BJP’s total vote share by practically eight share factors didn’t translate proportionately into a rise within the variety of seats. As a consequence, there was an uneven distribution of seats with increased vote shares.
Political analyst and columnist Rasheed Kidwai instructed ThePrint that the BJP’s rising vote share is attributable largely to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s charisma. In the course of the normal elections, folks are likely to forged votes for the PM candidate somewhat than for his or her native leaders.
This development is much less pronounced within the meeting elections, the place voting tends to be based mostly extra on native candidates and components.
“Relating to parliamentary elections, there is a rise of 12-25 per cent of votes for the BJP (in comparison with meeting elections). In Delhi, for instance, the BJP acquired 33 per cent of the votes within the meeting state elections (in 2015), however within the parliamentary elections (in 2019), it acquired over 56 per cent. There’s a distinction between a celebration’s core energy and the end result,” he stated.
Kidwai stated that the vote shares of BJP candidates within the Lok Sabha elections had been ramping up as a consequence of Modi’s recognition somewhat than due to their credentials or work.
“It’s sort of a windfall due to the charismatic management that’s there,” he famous.
One other knowledge level that sheds additional mild on the electoral pie in India is the vote share of non-BJP events.
ThePrint’s evaluation exhibits that non-BJP events secured a vote share of fifty per cent or extra in 64 seats in 2014. Within the 2019 elections, this quantity practically doubled to 117 seats.
Seen as a share, the non-BJP events’ seats with this vote share went up by a steep 82 per cent between 2014 and 2019. The BJP’s share improve was about 65 per cent.
The opposition can draw some solace from this reality, however non-BJP events on this calculation additionally embody former Nationwide Democratic Alliance (NDA) companions just like the Janata Dal (United), the Shiromani Akali Dal, and the united Shiv Sena.
Whereas some former allies just like the Nitish-Kumar-led JD(U) have now taken a robust anti-BJP stance at current, others just like the Telugu Desam Get together (TDP) appear to be gearing as much as return to the NDA fold.
Additionally Learn: From AIADMK, Shiv Sena to JD(U) — how BJP is rising at the price of its allies in addition to rivals
BJP & alliances
Because the 2019 elections, there have been some huge modifications in two electorally vital states — Bihar, which has 40 Lok Sabha seats, and Maharashtra which has 48.
Bihar’s JD(U) ended its alliance with the BJP final 12 months, whereas Maharashtra’s united Shiv Sena parted methods with it in November 2019.
Now JD(U)’s Nitish is busy corralling opposition events collectively, whereas the Shiv Sena has damaged into two components, with the Eknath Shinde faction having now shaped a authorities with the BJP in Maharashtra.
In Maharashtra, the Shiv Sena was a BJP ally in each the final Lok Sabha elections. The Sena maintained its 10 seats with over 50 per cent vote share, whereas the BJP’s share of such seats decreased from 20 to fifteen.
In Bihar, the BJP and JD(U) fought individually in 2014. The BJP gained two seats with over 50 per cent vote share, whereas JD(U) didn’t win any by such a landslide.
Nevertheless, in 2019, each events appeared to have considerably benefited from the alliance. BJP’s 14 MPs and JD(U)’s 11 MPs gained by huge vote shares, capitalising on one another’s vote banks. Moreover, their ally Lok Janshakti Get together (LJP) secured six such seats.
Prof Palshikar believes that aside from vote shares, the essential query for alliances is whether or not the vote is transferred or not.
He famous that the BJP feels it doesn’t require companions to garner votes in sure locations, however the influence of this stance would have to be thought of on a “state by state” foundation.
“In Bihar, this could absolutely harm the BJP. In Maharashtra, as an illustration, conscious that it wants a companion, BJP has chosen to indulge the breakaway group of the Shiv Sena,” he noticed.
A story of three states — Gujarat, UP, Tamil Nadu
A take a look at the vote shares of events in key states like Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu sheds additional mild on the interaction between alliances (or lack thereof) and the electoral outcomes for the BJP.
In Gujarat, the house state of the Prime Minister, the BJP guidelines the roost with no alliance companions. It gained all 26 seats in each the 2014 and 2019 elections, with all MPs securing over 50 per cent vote share. Actually, Darshana Vikram Jardosh, now a Union minister of state, had the very best vote share share in your entire nation, with 74.47 per cent in 2019.
In Uttar Pradesh, which has 80 Lok Sabha seats, the BJP gained solely 17 seats with an over 50 per cent vote share in Modi’s debut nationwide election.
5 years on, it appeared that the BJP had a formidable battle forward of it when the Samajwadi Get together (SP), Bahujan Samaj Get together (BSP), and Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) ganged up in opposition to it in a three-party alliance.
Nevertheless, as a substitute of the alliance denting the social gathering’s prospects, the variety of BJP MPs with over 50 per cent vote share elevated to 40.
However this doesn’t imply that the SP-BSP-RLD alliance didn’t reap any advantages for the events.
In 2014, just one MP from both of the three events had a vote share of over 50 per cent (SP’s Mulayam Singh Yadav from Mainpuri, with 60 per cent votes). On the time, all three events fought individually.
In 2019, nonetheless, 13 MPs of the SP-BSP-RLD mix acquired a vote share of over 50 per cent, suggesting that the alliance could have boosted their prospects.
In Tamil Nadu, the BJP shaped alliances with smaller events in 2014, however not one of the NDA candidates who gained seats secured over 50 per cent vote share.
The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), Congress, and different non-NDA events contested individually. J Jayalalithaa’s AIADMK gained six seats with over 50 per cent vote share on this election.
Within the 2019 elections, an alliance comprising DMK, Congress, CPI, CPM, Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) and Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) emerged as a dominant drive, securing 27 seats with over 50 per cent vote share.
Tamil Nadu, due to this fact, despatched the third highest variety of MPs with such substantial vote shares, subsequent solely to Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.
Might the Tamil Nadu outcomes be extrapolated to imply that a big all-India alliance could possibly counter the BJP?
Prof Palshikar says that drawing such conclusions will not be real looking.
“Even for the opposition, an all-India alliance doesn’t make any sense. A lot would depend upon the function of state events in a given state in defeating the BJP and the necessity to have extra votes,” he stated.
Kidwai, however, stated the discovering is “vital” that some events gained extra seats with over 50 per cent vote share whereas being in an alliance. However he cautioned that there aren’t any ensures.
“We now have political events who’ve a really robust caste- or community-based help. However after they come collectively to beat a stronger chief, it’s like a bet. Generally it clicks, generally it doesn’t,” he stated.
Query of ‘opposition unity’
The BJP has been actively working to safe over 50 per cent of the vote share in additional seats, and the information substantiates this, claimed BJP spokesperson Gopal Krishna Agarwal, chatting with ThePrint.
“The technique on which we’re working is to get greater than 50 per cent votes. From 224 we need to improve it to virtually 300 seats,” he stated.
Agarwal added that “opposition unity” was not one thing that bothered the BJP’s management.
“This improve within the quantity (of seats) exhibits that we’re working in the correct course. There are some individuals who ask ‘What about opposition unity?’ Then, Amit Shah ji says that we’re engaged on seats the place we’ll get greater than 50 per cent (vote share) so opposition unity doesn’t influence us,” he added.
Opposition leaders, nonetheless, profess that the earlier polls could not considerably predict the end result of the 2024 elections.
Praveen Chakravarty, chairman of the Congress’s knowledge analytics division, acknowledged {that a} vote share bigger than 40 per cent was an “vital benchmark”, however claimed issues might change on a dime.
“As they are saying in monetary markets, previous efficiency will not be an indicator of future returns,” he quipped.
In an identical vein, Salem Dharanidharan, DMK spokesperson, stated many modifications had taken place since 2019 and public sentiments had been shifting.
“That was 2019 and the elections are in 2024. That’s 5 years. There’s a big distinction. A number of issues have modified within the nation. There was Covid and no correct care was taken for migrant employees. Poverty has dramatically elevated. There have been extra divisive politics,” he claimed. “The BJP doesn’t get pleasure from the identical confidence it did in 2019.”
Based on Dharanidharan, calculations based mostly on vote shares present that BJP could be defeated in 2024. “The BJP didn’t get greater than 37 per cent vote share total. Nearly all of their seats got here from a handful of Hindi-speaking states. Which means 63 per cent vote share is for the opposition,” he stated.
He added that the opposition is “undoubtedly coming collectively” and anti-incumbency will maintain the remainder.
“Even when BJP is diminished to 200 seats, the opposition can have 300 seats. However I’m positive BJP is not going to cross greater than 150 seats and we’ll handle to win about 300 seats,” he claimed.
‘Bear in mind the Indira wave…’
Requested what the BJP’s rise in vote share means for the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, Prof Palshikar stated that the information exhibits that the social gathering “has located itself in a robust place”, however it stays to be seen if the developments of 2019 proceed.
Kidwai identified that political winds had been identified to vary course sharply previously.
“Character-driven events are likely to throw this verdict. However there’s a flip aspect,” he stated. “For those who take a look at the 1971 elections, lots of people gained on the Indira wave, however by the 1977 elections, Indira herself misplaced. So, all of them misplaced. It’s just like the winner takes all of it. It’s a very high-risk and high-stakes factor.”
(Edited by Asavari Singh)
Additionally Learn: Present of energy in Karnataka, however 2024 might be an uphill process for ‘united’ opposition. Right here’s why