The U.S. Division of Power on Feb. 14, 2025 in Washington, D.C.
Anna Moneymaker | Getty Photographs Information | Getty Photographs
California has paused rebate packages providing hundreds of {dollars} to shoppers who make their properties and home equipment extra power environment friendly as a consequence of a Trump administration freeze on federal funding.
Whereas a handful of different states additionally not too long ago halted their packages, California is the biggest state to delay a rollout up to now — placing $582 million earmarked for shoppers and program administration in danger.
California had issued its first rebate verify to shoppers in February, based on the state’s Power Fee.
“Many states have been simply getting began on their packages, and instantly they’re tossed into turmoil,” mentioned Lowell Ungar, director of federal coverage on the American Council for an Power-Environment friendly Financial system.

The packages in query, Residence Power Rebates, have been created by the Inflation Discount Act. President Biden signed it into legislation in 2022.
The legislation allotted as much as $8.8 billion of federal funds for states, territories and the District of Columbia to disburse to shoppers within the type of rebates.
Customers have been offered as much as $8,000 of Residence Effectivity Rebates and as much as $14,000 of Residence Electrification and Equipment Rebates, per federal legislation. Most quantities fluctuate per family, relying on components like revenue eligibility.
The rebates intention to scale back the price of house upgrades like putting in insulation and warmth pumps or shopping for environment friendly home equipment like electrical stoves — with an eye fixed to additionally lowering shoppers’ power payments and chopping planet-warming carbon emissions.
Extra from Private Finance:
Congress’ proposed cuts might jeopardize Medicaid
Canada, Mexico tariffs create ‘ripple results’ on shopper costs
Social Safety plans to chop about 7,000 employees
All states besides South Dakota had utilized for the federal funds. The U.S. Division of Power accepted these functions, and states have been in varied phases of rollout by the top of the Biden administration.
Nevertheless, the Trump administration on Jan. 27 put a freeze on the disbursement of federal funds that battle with the president’s agenda, together with initiatives associated to inexperienced power and local weather change.
The destiny of that freeze is up within the air as courts weigh authorized challenges to the coverage.
The U.S. Division of Power did not return a request from CNBC for remark.
The California Power Fee — which had launched an $80 million first section of its house power rebate program within the fall — paused its program on Feb. 25, based on a California Power Fee web site.
The pause will stay in place “till the Trump Administration supplies further info on the funding,” Fee employees wrote in an e-mailed assertion.
California was accepted for the second-largest tranche of funding for the power rebate packages, behind solely Texas. (The U.S. Power Division awarded $689 million to Texas, based on an archived federal web site.)
The Texas State Power Conservation Workplace did not return a request for touch upon the standing of its program.
Since Jan. 31, California hasn’t been in a position to efficiently draw down funds for administrative prices to run its rebate program, based on a California Power Fee web site. The U.S. Power Division has additionally eliminated details about Residence Power Rebate packages from its web site, the CEC mentioned.
Not all states have paused their packages, nevertheless.
For instance, officers in Maine and North Carolina not too long ago confirmed to CNBC that funding by their rebate packages stays obtainable — for now.
The North Carolina Division of Environmental High quality is “carefully watching any federal actions which will change the operations of the Power Saver NC program,” a spokesperson mentioned in an e-mailed assertion.
Completely different states might have “completely different threat tolerances” in terms of administering these packages and issuing rebates when it is unclear if they will ultimately be reimbursed, Ungar mentioned.