“[Mary] additionally argues that Wixen, as a music writer, didn’t owe [Cher] any fiduciary duties,” the Justice of the Peace famous. “Nonetheless, [Mary] agrees that Wixen was [Cher’s] agent and [Mary’s] agent, and an agent owes a principal fiduciary duties.”
“If Wixen didn’t owe [Cher] fiduciary duties, then Wixen was not [Cher’s] agent. But when the 2011 Agreements weren’t enough to determine an company relationship with Wixen, it’s unclear how the 2019/2020 Settlement established an company relationship between [Mary] and Wixen,” the Justice of the Peace added.
“Thus, Defendant’s argument would result in a conclusion that Wixen was by no means an agent to both [May] or [Cher]. The inclusion of a non-agent third occasion on an in any other case privileged communication would additionally waive the privilege.”