Apr. 11 2024, Printed 6:00 p.m. ET
The person who accused Chris Brown of assaulting him inside a London nightclub is dragging the star’s controversial previous into the multimillion-dollar lawsuit. In paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, the alleged sufferer, Amadou “Abe” Diaw, accused his tour promoter of ignoring Brown’s historical past and fostering an setting the place the “violent performer was positive to trigger hurt.”
Article continues under commercial
As this outlet reported, Diaw is suing for $16 million over the alleged brutal assault in 2023, claiming Brown smashed a bottle of Don Julio 1942 over his head at TAPE nightclub in England.
In response to Diaw, the No Steering singer continued to pound him with “crushing blows” till allegedly knocking him unconscious. He claimed Brown did not cease there, allegedly stomping on his physique whereas he was out chilly.
Article continues under commercial
Diaw stated he was taken to hospital for his alleged accidents, which reportedly included cuts to his head and torn ligaments to his leg. Within the newest submitting, Brown’s alleged sufferer slammed his tour promoter after they tried to dodge accountability. He argued the singer’s historical past of “violent assaults” is well-documented, a lot in order that it prevented him from getting into a number of nations.
Article continues under commercial
“This can be a case a couple of company that knowingly created an setting the place a violent performer was positive to trigger hurt …, Dwell Nation employed Chris Brown (“Brown”) to carry out in a weeks-long European Tour understanding full properly that Brown had engaged in appreciable Prior Misconduct,” Diaw’s submitting earlier this week learn.
“This Misconduct features a litany of violent assaults that beforehand brought about the UK’s (“UK”) and Australia’s immigration workplaces to disclaim Brown entry of their respective nations, thereby forcing Brown to cancel prior excursions in 2011 and 2015, respectively.”
Article continues under commercial
Article continues under commercial
Diaw argued that the tour promoter ignored the “purple flags” and “proceeded with organizing the tour.” He additional charged that the promoter added “gas to the fireplace by naming the tour the ‘Below the Affect’ Tour, a headline that conjures up the consumption of alcohol and narcotics.”
By no means miss a narrative — join the RadarOnline.com e-newsletter to get your day by day dose of dope. Each day. Breaking. Celeb information. All free.
MORE ON:
Chris Brown
Article continues under commercial
Diaw stated, “It comes as no shock that one night following a efficiency, whereas beneath the affect at a London evening membership, Brown brutally attacked Plaintiff (with a bottle of tequila). Thus, regardless of understanding about Brown’s Prior Misconduct and propensity for violence, Dwell Nation sought to empower his bad-boy persona by assigning the tour a nefarious title, moderately than decrease these threats to the general public (i.e., assigning safety to Brown, limiting his social engagements, and so forth.)”
Article continues under commercial
Article continues under commercial
He argued that “Dwell Nation acted deliberately with acutely aware disregard of the results that might, and in reality did, happen. As a result of such conduct qualifies as malice and oppression, punitive damages are acceptable, and the current Movement fails.”
This comes after Dwell Nation filed a movement to dismiss a number of the claims, insisting it shouldn’t be on the hook for the punitive damages he is demanding.
Article continues under commercial
Article continues under commercial
“All of Dwell Nation’s alleged conduct is expressly alleged to have been both negligent or grossly negligent, neither of which is adequate beneath California regulation to permit for restoration of punitive damages. Plaintiff’s FAC fails to sufficiently allege that any officer, director, or managing agent of Dwell Nation perpetrated any oppression or malice, ratified or approved Brown’s alleged assault of Plaintiff, or employed Brown with advance data of his unfitness for the job and acutely aware disregard for the protection of others,” the corporate charged.
“Plaintiff has not adequate pled that any officer, director, or managing agent of Dwell Nation was conscious of Plaintiff’s existence or presence on the London nightclub to have willfully and intentionally failed to forestall Chris Brown from attacking Plaintiff as a way to be entitled punitive damages for ‘oppression.’”
The case is ongoing.