Brown denied all allegations of wrongdoing within the go well with.
Dec. 27 2023, Printed 2:00 p.m. ET
Chris Brown’s ex-housekeeper who demanded $71 million in damages over an alleged canine assault on the singer’s California house revealed her critical accidents.
RadarOnline.com has obtained the surprising pictures the housekeeper, who introduced her lawsuit utilizing the pseudonym Jane Doe, submitted into proof.
WARNING: The harm pictures are posted beneath and are graphic.
Article continues beneath commercial
As we beforehand reported, Doe introduced her criticism in July 2021. She claimed to have been working at Brown’s home on December 12, 2020, when the incident went down.
Doe stated she was taking out the trash when a Caucasian Orvchake/Caucasian Shepherd canine named Hades attacked her. She claimed the animal ripped elements of her face, arms, and legs off. The housekeeper stated Brown got here exterior and instructed his staff to take away the canine from the property.
Article continues beneath commercial
“That group took the canine and dumped him in a pound in Humboldt County the place he was euthanized a couple of days later. The canine’s chip linked the canine’s possession to the defendant Chris Brown,” Doe’s lawyer wrote in courtroom paperwork.
Doe stated she feared for her life and has needed to take care of the bodily accidents and emotional misery ever since.
Article continues beneath commercial
The entertainer demanded the lawsuit be thrown out. He denied all allegations of wrongdoing. Brown accused Doe of getting triggered her accidents by allegedly mistreating the canine.
Brown stated Doe “voluntarily teased, abused, and mistreated the canine and thereby provoked the assault.”
MORE ON:
Chris Brown
One of many accidents.
Article continues beneath commercial
His lawyer wrote, “[Doe] invited the accidents now complained of and assumed the danger of them with full information of the magnitude of that threat, in that she knew her foregoing conduct would possibly trigger the canine to assault her, and significantly injure her, each of which occasions are alleged to have occurred.”
Not too long ago, Brown refused to take a seat for a deposition in Doe’s lawsuit. He claimed a default had been improperly entered towards him within the case and Doe had refused to conform to vacate it.
Brown stated he would sit for a deposition as soon as the default was vacated.
In her new movement, Doe stated she wouldn’t conform to Brown’s request. She stated he had been correctly served with the lawsuit however did not file his response by the deadline.
Article continues beneath commercial
Doe’s face after the assault.
As a part of her movement, Doe submitted pictures displaying the “devastating accidents she suffered because of the defendant’s negligent care and management of the vicious canine on his property that he let roam free, and this was the consequence.”
A number of of the photographs submitted are too graphic to put up.
On prime of Doe’s lawsuit, Brown was sued by Doe’s sister Patricia who needs damages for the emotional misery she suffered from watching her sister being attacked.