THE BCCI’s Committee of Directors (CoA), headed by former Comptroller and Auditor Normal (CAG) Vinod Rai, turned a blind eye to a report about corruption on the grassroots degree in Indian cricket.
There have been additionally lapses in a sexual harassment investigation towards BCCI’s former CEO Rahul Johri.
These are a number of the allegations made by former Delhi Police commissioner and Indian cricket board’s anti-corruption unit chief Neeraj Kumar in his new e book ‘A Cop In Cricket’.
On the seriousness with which BCCI officers seen the function of the Anti-Corruption Unit, Kumar writes: “Nobody on the BCCI wished to know what we had been doing; no one wished to hearken to our woes — about lack of assets. I might not be fallacious in saying that no one on the BCCI wished to have something to do with us. The 2013 spot-fixing case and its aftermath, it appeared to be, had been all however forgotten; no one among any consequence within the Board felt the necessity to stop its recurrence sooner or later.”
When Kumar, in a presentation, delivered to the discover of the CoA the corruption happening in native leagues such because the Rajwada League in Kota, Rajasthan, which additionally caught the eye of anti-corruption watchdog Sportsradar Integrity Providers, he says he was dissatisfied by the response.
“I realised I had wasted my breath… By now, I had begun to despair. I couldn’t miss the writing on the wall. Corruption was a non-issue within the BCCI…”
Kumar entertained ideas of quitting however determined to remain on to try to weed out the corrupt within the smaller leagues.
One BCCI official was extra frightened in regards to the ‘political fallout’ of the anti-corruption operation in Kota as a substitute of appreciating the progress made by the ACU. One of many organisers of the league was a vice chairman of the Rajasthan Cricket Affiliation.
Kumar and his crew busted a deliberate try by bookies to decelerate the pitch by watering it forward of an Indian Premier League match between Delhi Daredevils and Gujarat Lions in Kanpur.
In his e book, Kumar additionally requires sports activities integrity laws to focus on pitch siders — folks paid by bookies to present match info from a stadium earlier than it’s telecast on TV with a purpose to benefit from the time lag within the broadcast. “Their questioning revealed that for each occasion (fall of wickets, fours, sixes, runs scored and so forth) they had been paid Rs 1,000 by the bookies.”
IPL groups, he advises, ought to do due diligence earlier than outsourcing expertise hunts to non-public people who run cash-for-selection scams and dupe gullible cricketers.
Kumar additionally alleges that former BCCI CEO Johri’s contacts in excessive locations allowed him to rejoin work after allegations of sexual harassment had been levelled towards him by a lady working on the BCCI headquarters in Mumbai.
“The way in which Vinod Rai dealt with the allegations of sexual harassment towards the CEO will proceed to mystify most individuals who think about the officers of the nation’s premier civil service, particularly the IAS… However why would he try this? The hypothesis within the BCCI was that Johri was near a strong central minister who took a eager curiosity within the goings-on on the BCCI. May this have been the rationale Rai was seen to have protected him?” Kumar writes.
Johri didn’t reply to cellphone calls or textual content messages from The Indian Categorical on Wednesday.
“A feminine worker of the BCCI known as their partnership a ‘father-son’ relationship, the place the daddy didn’t want to hear something towards his prodigal son, nonetheless, severe the criticism was towards him,” Kumar summarises.
Johri resumed cost in November 2018 after two members of the committee mentioned the allegations had been “false”, “baseless” and “fabricated”. The third member, ladies’s rights lawyer Veena Gowda, was the voice of dissent and suggested Johri to bear “gender-sensitivity counselling/ coaching”.
In one other allegation, Kumar mentions a criticism he acquired from younger cricketers in Mahendragarh, Haryana about an official demanding sexual favours in lieu of choice within the district crew.
“The worst half was that the BCCI CEO and CoA chief took no motion when the inquiry report was despatched to them. I typically reminded them each about our findings, however each time they feigned full ignorance of the report,” Kumar writes.
Former BCCI treasurer and Haryana cricket outdated hand Anirudh Chaudhry instructed The Indian Categorical that the ACU chief had different motives. “To me, these appear to be surmises and conjectures introduced in a fashion to assist with e book gross sales presently, and at the moment to achieve a attainable extension of his tenure with the BCCI, about which he additionally appears to be holding a grudge towards Mr. Rai.”
Chaudhary additionally mentioned that no such criticism was delivered to the discover of the Haryana Cricket Affiliation.
“So far as I’m conscious, the BCCI/COA didn’t talk any such factor to the Haryana Cricket Affiliation and the one motive why that may have occurred is that there was no substance within the allegations made. It was evident to everybody that Mr. Rai and I had our variations and located ourselves on the reverse ends of a cantankerous litigation, probably that’s why the allegations had been made on to the BCCI.”
Talking to this paper, Kumar mentioned, “My expertise within the BCCI was very totally different from my expertise as a police officer. Throughout my time within the BCCI, the directors had been very detached to the difficulty of corruption. I additionally wished to reveal sure issues associated to cricket directors, together with what was taking place in state cricket associations. In any case, the sport belongs to the followers and they need to know the reality.”