“The Respondent makes an attempt to justify his conduct by suggesting that he should touch upon the moment case to counter public narratives or incorrect reporting by the media or public,” in response to the docs. “Or, put one other means, the Respondent is in search of to litigate the moment case within the court docket of public opinion.”
Prieto was blasted for using “the soapbox afforded to him to boost the proverbial temperature, assault Obumseli, his household, the State, and to facilitate a docu-series that’s clearly meant to get inadmissible data to the jury pool upfront of trial.”
As we beforehand reported, Clenney’s lawyer disputed the claims that he acted inappropriately whereas constructing their protection, citing the “strategic launch” of the “Elevator Video” which captured a dispute between Clenney and Obumseli inside his response.
He added, “It will considerably prejudice Ms. Clenney if the protection is unable to right any misinformation or be prevented from explaining data that’s taken out of context.”