Diddy’s ex-nanny dismissed the lawsuit she filed towards the embattled mogul — solely months after demanding he be sanctioned for allegedly refusing to show over paperwork.
In line with courtroom paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, Raven Walden, who labored for Diddy from 2018 to 2020, knowledgeable the courtroom she was dismissing her whole case with prejudice.
The transfer comes after Diddy was hit with a number of federal lawsuits over alleged sexual assault — and the FBI launched a intercourse trafficking investigation that included raids of the mogul’s properties.
As beforehand first reported, in her lawsuit, Raven claimed she was employed after Diddy’s ex Kim Porter died. She mentioned she was requested to assist maintain Kim and Diddy’s twins, Jessie James and D’Lila.
Raven mentioned she moved into Diddy’s LA mansion and have become shut together with his household. Nevertheless, she mentioned issues went south after she knowledgeable Diddy and his workforce that she was pregnant.
The ex-nanny mentioned she was fired. Raven mentioned she was informed Diddy thinks it wasn’t a very good instance for his daughters to be round an unwed pregnant lady. Her lawsuit demanded unspecified damages.
Diddy’s rep known as the lawsuit a “meritless shakedown.” The mogul admitted he employed Raven however denied her place was meant to be long-term.
His rep mentioned, “Her babysitting providers have been all the time meant to be non permanent particularly for the reason that ladies have been getting older and spending a lot of the day at college.”
In response, Diddy additionally denied Raven was Kim’s organic niece. His attorneys argued Raven was terminated for failing to do her job correctly not on account of her being pregnant.
Diddy argued Raven’s claims needs to be dismissed on account of her failure to “satisfactorily carry out her job duties, and in any other case conduct herself in accordance with the requirements and insurance policies of Combs Defendants.”
He claimed the choice to terminate Raven was not discriminatory.
Diddy and Raven had been going forwards and backwards throughout the discovery section. Raven claimed Diddy and his workforce have been dragging their ft in turning over paperwork and knowledge.
Her lawyer mentioned, “Defendants have been utterly evasive of their discovery responses.” She demanded $5k in sanctions.
Diddy denied the claims and mentioned he had produced all that was mandatory. His lawyer mentioned, “As a substitute of submitting the Movement and losing Courtroom and social gathering assets, [Raven] ought to have consulted with the [Diddy] on a manufacturing schedule as a way to perceive once they can be producing the paperwork they dedicated to. Sanctions usually are not warranted underneath these circumstances as a result of the paperwork sought have been produced, the Movement was irrelevant to the [Diddy’s] manufacturing, and [Raven’s] counsel manufactured a dispute that didn’t exist.”
Now, the matter is moot. Diddy, who has been laying low in Miami, has but to discuss the dismissal.