LONDON, Dec 5 (Reuters) – Making it simpler to use the European Union ‘taxonomy’ for classifying sustainable actions and investments to tell buyers is now a high precedence, the bloc’s monetary providers chief Mairead McGuinness stated on Monday.
The bloc is introducing measures to assist the economic system attain net-zero emissions targets by 2050, corresponding to by disclosures from asset managers and firms, underpinned by a taxonomy.
The taxonomy stays a “work in progress” and McGuinness stated she was conscious of firm issues over its “usability” as guidelines must be utilized subsequent 12 months.
“We’ll goal to publish over 200 continuously requested questions to assist companies with reporting obligations beneath the taxonomy,” she advised the European Parliament.
“The objective for me is to make the taxonomy work successfully. We intend to take a look at this difficulty of usability very rigorously.”
She can even publish steerage early in 2023 to make clear sure factors within the bloc’s sustainability associated disclosures for asset managers, referred to as SFDR.
“We might have to take a much wider have a look at this regulation,” she stated, including this would come with a public session early in 2023, wanting on the position of the foundations in mitigating greenwashing or over-inflated sustainability claims.
Technical particulars for implementing firm sustainability disclosures in annual reviews, referred to as CSRD, might be introduced ahead subsequent 12 months as nicely.
“Now we have achieved quite a bit and now we have to guarantee that collectively it really works,” McGuinness stated.
A phase-in slightly than large bang method is prone to be finest method so as to add remaining “taxo4” components to the taxonomy – water, round economic system, air pollution prevention and safety of biodiversity – McGuinness stated.
It might begin with sectors the place there may be already consensus, she stated.
The EU government can also be contemplating a proposal to inject extra transparency and keep away from conflicts of curiosity at compilers of rankings on firm environmental, social and governance credentials, she stated.
Reporting by Huw Jones
Modifying by Alistair Bell
: .