LONDON, Jan 16 (Reuters) – European Union regulators mustn’t outline greenwashing in legislation, fund business teams have advised the bloc’s markets watchdog, citing considerations this is able to complicate a sector in “fixed flux”.
Trillions of {dollars} have flowed into investments claiming to be climate-friendly, however there have been few sanctions for greenwashing, or exaggerated inexperienced credentials.
Regulators say sanctioning greenwashing may very well be simpler with a authorized definition, although the time period is usually used extra broadly to explain deliberate or negligent practices relating to different environmental, social and governance (ESG)-related points.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the bloc’s banking and insurance coverage watchdogs have sought business views on legally defining greenwashing.
In its response, the U.S.-based Funding Firm Institute (ICI), which represents funding funds, stated sustainability-related statements, actions, omissions and communications may very well be deceptive, both deliberately or unintentionally, on the entity, services or products stage.
“Quite than searching for to outline ‘greenwashing’ and thereby creating a brand new authorized time period, we advocate as a substitute that EU authorities describe the conduct or circumstances of concern,” ICI stated.
“Looking for to undertake a normal definition of greenwashing or enshrine it in laws can be counterproductive.”
The European Fund and Asset Administration Affiliation (EFAMA) stated the EU ought to use current guidelines and instruments to fight greenwashing, and never improve complexity by introducing a brand new definition indifferent from guidelines already in place.
EFAMA additionally pointed to the business’s reliance on third-party information, together with from corporations and ESG ranking corporations, that was not within the management of asset managers.
“Contemplating the present diploma of regulatory uncertainty and ongoing evolution, we should be cautious to not apply the time period greenwashing too broadly,” stated Anyve Arakelijan, Regulatory Coverage Adviser at EFAMA.
“Strengthening the understanding of what constitutes greenwashing and having harmonised supervisory motion to deal with this danger is essential.”
Whereas main regulators have to date baulked at defining greenwashing in legislation, they’re more and more utilizing their current powers and in addition contemplating new legal guidelines in areas reminiscent of disclosure.
Britain’s monetary watchdog, for instance, stated in October it deliberate to usher in an anti-greenwashing rule for all corporations. In the USA, in the meantime, a number of corporations together with BNY Mellon have been fined for deceptive buyers.
Reporting by Simon Jessop
Modifying by Mark Potter
: .