With Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot giving assent to the Larger Bengaluru Governance Invoice (GBGB) 2024, the IT capital is about to usher within the Larger Bengaluru Authority (GBA), which has sweeping powers to streamline governance within the city area. Nonetheless, city mobility consultants and civic teams have identified that the transformation comes at the price of diluting the powers of an autonomous physique such because the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) that oversees planning and coordinating transport within the Bengaluru Metropolitan Space.
Greater than two years have handed since BMLTA was notified, but the Act stays on paper, with no guidelines being framed or no members being formally appointed.
The Larger Bengaluru Governance Act (GBGA) positions the GBA because the apex physique for city governance, with binding authority over companies just like the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Company (BMTC), Bengaluru Metro Rail Company Restricted (BMRCL), and different city improvement companies beforehand coordinated by the BMLTA.
Satya Arikutharam, city mobility skilled, mentioned, “The GBGA dilutes the core features of BMLTA and makes it an ineffective institute even earlier than its institution. The town will miss the rigorous and unbiased evaluation specified below Part 19 of BMLTA earlier than approval for main city transport tasks.”
GBGA explicitly transfers a number of BMLTA provisions to the GBA. Below its planning features, the GBA is designated because the ‘Planning Authority’ for the Larger Bengaluru space below the Karnataka City and Nation Planning Act, 1961. This contains approving layouts and guaranteeing compliance with the grasp plan, roles that beforehand intersected with the BMLTA’s efforts to align land use with transport planning. The GBA’s oversight of the Bengaluru Metropolitan Planning Committee (BMPC), chaired by the Chief Minister, additional consolidates its planning authority, probably marginalising the BMLTA’s enter in metropolitan transport methods.
The GBA, chaired by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, is tasked with overseeing as much as seven municipal firms carved out of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). Its features span administrative management, city planning, coordination of public authorities, and execution of main infrastructure tasks, together with mobility plans.
Main infrastructure tasks, together with vehicular tunnels proposed below the Model Bengaluru initiative, upcoming Metro networks, and different city infrastructure plans, require approval from BMLTA as specified below Part 19 of the Act. Below Part 19, the Act ensures that the authority may have the ability to approve all main city transport tasks proposed from the attitude of consistency with the Complete Mobility Plan and in a time-bound method. It additional states that no authority, company, or division below the state authorities shall provoke any public, non-public, or public-private partnership challenge regarding city mobility with out acquiring prior approval of the authority.
Story continues under this advert
BBMP, in its authorities order in September 2024, acknowledges the approval of BMLTA for an underground vehicular tunnel connecting Hebbal and Silk Board and different proposed elevated corridors.
Specialists level out that with the institution of a ‘centralised’ authority like GBA, it assumes important tasks beforehand held by the BMLTA, resembling formulating mobility plans and coordinating companies like BMTC, BMRCL, City Growth division and different companies.
No clear sequence of course of on land use: Specialists
Arikutharam mentioned that as per GBGA coordination between BMRCL and BMTC, the preparation of Mobility Plan, and formulation of main infrastructure tasks – all core BMLTA features – will now be undertaken by Larger Bengaluru Authority. “This has severe adverse penalties for sustainable city mobility as GBA is designed for unfettered actual property improvement,” he identified.
Additional, GBA integrates and supervises public authorities resembling BMTC, BMRCL, and Bangalore Growth Authority (BDA), issuing binding instructions to streamline municipal and transport actions, and provisions that BMLTA was additionally entrusted with.
Story continues under this advert
GBA additionally formulates and executes main infrastructural tasks, together with mobility-related plans (e.g., roads, tunnels), straight or by means of Particular Objective Autos (SPVs), coming shut on the heels of the features of an autonomous BMLTA. BMLTA additionally has the ability to subject directives to move companies to align operations with the CMP objectives and sustainable mobility aims.
The GBA’s skill to ascertain Geographical Data Techniques (GIS) and Clever Transport Techniques (ITS) additionally overlaps with the BMLTA’s initiatives for technology-driven mobility options.
A Krishna Prashanth, member at CIVIC Bangalore, mentioned, “From a constitutional and authorized standpoint BMLTA is basically a planning physique that helps construct a transit-oriented improvement plan coupled with land use plan. When GBA assumes this position, the transport plan is not going to maintain any worth. The Larger Bengaluru Governance Act is unclear on the method of implementing transport and mobility tasks. There isn’t a clear sequence of course of as to who will assess the land use, waste administration, and different elements.”
Secondly, he mentioned, the earlier Finance Fee mandated that BMLTA works consistent with the Metropolitan Planning Committee (MPC), which is democratic and consultative. “Nonetheless, GBA neither allies with this nor any city transport coverage envisioned by the central authorities. Furthermore, it isn’t clear the place BMLTA sits within the massive scheme of issues below GBA,” he mentioned.
Story continues under this advert
Nonetheless, an officer within the state authorities, on situation of anonymity, instructed The Indian Specific that, “BMLTA just isn’t dropped, will probably be formally constituted within the coming days. Nonetheless, with GBA, a variety of the latter’s features align with these of BMLTA. Therefore, there’s a battle of curiosity.”
In line with Sandeep Anirudhan, convenor of Residents’ Agenda for Bengaluru, the Larger Bengaluru Governance Invoice is poorly drafted and undermines important planning establishments. “The constitutionally mandated Metropolitan Planning Committee stays defunct after 33 years, and now its position is usurped by the brand new Larger Bengaluru Authority. Equally, the BMLTA, meant to unify transport planning, is sidelined—its government head is merely an invitee with out voting rights. This sample of making after which undermining establishments spells catastrophe, as vested pursuits exploit town, pushing Bengaluru into unplanned, unsustainable collapse,” Anirudhan remarked.