3 min learnNew DelhiMar 1, 2026 10:23 PM IST
Elon Musk has criticised OpenAI’s security claims and recommended that his AI firm, xAI, is healthier at prioritising person security than the ChatGPT maker.
“No one has dedicated suicide due to Grok, however apparently they’ve due to ChatGPT,” Musk mentioned throughout his deposition in his 2024 lawsuit accusing OpenAI of abandoning its authentic non-profit mission that he funded. The transcript of Musk’s video deposition, which passed off in September 2025, was publicly launched earlier this week, forward of the case going to a jury trial in April this 12 months.
The incidents referenced by Musk in his deposition are associated to the sequence of lawsuits towards OpenAI alleging that ChatGPT’s manipulative dialog ways led a number of customers, together with youngsters, to expertise adverse psychological well being results and dying by suicide.
Musk’s testimony signifies that these lawsuits may develop into a key a part of the plaintiff’s argument in courtroom. Primarily based on what has already come to gentle, the high-stakes trial is prone to floor recent and engaging particulars about OpenAI’s early days in addition to the circumstances surrounding CEO Sam Altman’s transient ouster and Microsoft’s complicated relationship with OpenAI.
In his deposition, Musk mentioned that OpenAI’s business partnerships may compromise AI security as they allegedly prioritise pace, scale, and income above person security issues.
Nonetheless, the billionaire CEO’s feedback come at a time when xAI has confronted security issues of its personal. In January 2026, Musk’s social media platform X was flooded with non-consensual nude pictures generated by xAI’s Grok, a few of which had been mentioned to be of minors. This has led the European Union and the California Legal professional Normal’s workplace to open separate investigations into the Grok incident, with some governments taking stricter motion by banning the AI chatbot.
‘Wished AI security to be prioritised’
Within the newly filed deposition, Musk was questioned a couple of public letter he had signed in 2023, together with over 1,100 AI consultants and others, calling for a 6-month pause of the event of AI programs extra highly effective than GPT-4, OpenAI’s flagship mannequin on the time.
Story continues beneath this advert
Musk claimed he had signed the AI security letter as a result of “it appeared like a good suggestion,” not as a result of he had simply integrated an AI firm trying to compete with OpenAI. “I signed it, as many individuals did, to induce warning with AI growth. I simply needed…AI security to be prioritised,” he added.
Responding to different questions requested throughout the deposition, Musk mentioned that synthetic common intelligence (AGI) “has a threat” and mentioned that he “was mistaken” about his supposed $100 million donation to OpenAI after the plaintiff submitted an amended criticism within the case, which places the precise determine nearer to $44.8 million.
© IE On-line Media Providers Pvt Ltd