India vs Nice Britain hockey: After the Indian hockey crew defeated the Nice Britain crew in a nail-biting penalty shootout to enter the semi-finals on the Paris Olympics, Hockey India stated they’ve formally raised considerations concerning the high quality of umpiring and decision-making within the ongoing Paris Olympics.
One of many extra critical considerations raised by the Indian hockey federation from the India vs Nice Britain hockey match was teaching of the Nice Britain goalkeeper from behind the goalpost in the course of the shoot-out and using a video pill by a goalkeeper in the course of the India vs Nice Britain shoot-out.
Hockey India stated they had been irked by the way in which the essential India vs Nice Britain sport was dealt with.
Within the India vs Nice Britain sport, the Indian hockey crew performed over 40 minutes with one man much less on the pitch after Amit Rohidas was crimson carded for a stick in Nice Britain participant William Calnan’s face.
Nearly instantly after dropping the ace first rusher to the crimson card, India took a 1-0 lead within the sport, due to captain Harmanpreet Singh, who scored from the penalty nook. This was his seventh objective at Paris 2024.
However Nice Britain scored with half-time in sight to degree at 1-1. The rating stayed 1-1 until the tip of the 60 minutes. Within the shootout, PR Sreejesh, who already had performed the most effective video games of his life, managed to pressure two misses from the Nice Britain facet to pull India over the road.
What has Indian hockey federation complained about?
In a letter to media, Hockey India stated that it had “formally raised considerations concerning the high quality of umpiring and decision-making within the ongoing Paris Olympic Video games 2024”
Hockey’s India’s assertion stated: “The criticism focuses on a important match between India and Nice Britain, the place a number of inconsistencies in officiating probably influenced the sport’s consequence. The important thing points highlighted embody: inconsistent video umpire critiques, significantly concerning the crimson card choice for an Indian participant, which has eroded belief within the video evaluation system; the teaching of a goalkeeper from behind the goalpost in the course of the shoot-out, and using a video pill by a goalkeeper in the course of the shoot-out.”
“These incidents have undermined confidence within the officiating course of amongst gamers, coaches, and followers. Hockey India requires an intensive evaluation of those issues to uphold the integrity of the game and guarantee truthful play in future matches,” the Hockey India assertion stated.