Jon Jones will tackle Ciryl Gane in the principle occasion of UFC 285 on Saturday, March 4. Followers are eagerly ready for the bout between Jones and Gane and a few of them are already arguing that French MMA fighter would be the most technically sound fighter that ‘Bones’ has ever confronted.
Amid such arguments, Jones took to Twitter on Monday and tweeted about his UFC 239 battle in opposition to Brazil’s Thiago Santos in July 2019. Taking place the reminiscence lane, ‘Bones’ reminisced how his Brazilian opponent was a drive to reckon with and highlighted his wonderful abilities.
ALSO READ: UFC President Dana White opens up on prospect of Islam Makhachev vs Alexander Volkanovski rematch
“Man I simply completed watching my Thiago Santos battle once more. I believe it’s loopy that you just guys think about gane probably the most technical kickboxer I’ve ever confronted. Every part Thiago did have dangerous intentions on it. Dude had lightning pace, energy, explosiveness. Loopy versatility.”
In an obvious Jibe at Gane, Jones additional highlighted how the French kickboxer had peformed properly in opposition to under par opponents.
“ganes final three opponents had horrible protection. These guys couldn’t cease a kick if their life trusted it. He’s fought flat footed boxers his final three fights,” tweeted Jones.
Whereas undermining Gane, Jones additionally remembered the French fighter’s bout in opposition to Francis Ngannou in UFC 270 which Gane had misplaced. Gane was in a commanding place within the match at one stage however acquired defeated by an skilled Ngannou. ‘Bones’ responded to a fan’s remark “Gane the man that went for a heel hook to lose a battle”.
In a blunt criticism of Gane’s ways in opposition to Ngannou in January 2022, Jones tweeted “Gave up a dominant place, went for a leg lock when all he needed to do was lay on an exhausted Francis.”
Because the bout between Gane and Jones in UFC 285 attracts close to, followers can count on extra thoughts video games and snide remarks in opposition to one another.