NEW YORK, Nov 2 (Reuters) – A U.S. jury started deliberations on Wednesday within the trial of Tom Barrack, the onetime personal fairness government and fundraiser for former President Donald Trump, on expenses that he acted as a overseas agent for the United Arab Emirates and lied to federal investigators.
Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn final 12 months charged Barrack with utilizing his affect with Trump’s 2016 presidential marketing campaign and later his administration to push the UAE’s coverage pursuits with out notifying the U.S. lawyer common as required by legislation that he was appearing as an agent for the Center Jap nation.
Barrack, 75, can be accused of obstruction of justice and making false statements to FBI brokers in 2019 about his interactions with Emirati officers and their representatives.
He has pleaded not responsible and has described his interactions with Center Jap officers as a part of his position working Colony Capital, now often known as DigitalBridge Group Inc (DBRG.N). Barrack testified in his personal protection through the trial, telling jurors he by no means agreed to be a UAE agent.
Barrack raised cash for Trump through the 2016 marketing campaign and chaired Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee.
After three hours of deliberations, U.S. District Decide Brian Cogan mentioned the jury had requested transcripts of Barrack’s testimony concerning the fees of mendacity to investigators.
Barrack testified final week that there have been no questions he refused to reply through the FBI interview.
“I did not imagine this was an inquisition,” Barrack mentioned.
Throughout the six-week trial, prosecutors displayed a whole lot of textual content messages and emails they mentioned confirmed that Emirati officers gave Barrack enter on what he ought to say in tv interviews and an op-ed article concerning the Center East, and that Barrack handed alongside delicate details about U.S. overseas coverage.
The OPEC member nation paid Barrack again in 2017 and 2018 by investing $374 million from its sovereign wealth funds together with his firm, then often known as Colony Capital, prosecutors mentioned.
Barrack’s legal professionals didn’t dispute that he had been in contact with Emirati officers and infrequently sought their suggestions, however they mentioned any influence on U.S. coverage or public opinion was insignificant.
“Strive, simply strive to determine the place on this case you heard anyone who talked about actual coverage that was affected,” Randall Jackson, a lawyer for Barrack, mentioned in his closing argument on Tuesday.
Jackson mentioned Emirati investments represented lower than 1% of Colony’s stability sheet. He mentioned that whereas Barrack, who’s of Lebanese descent, needed higher U.S. relations within the Center East, he by no means agreed to behave topic to the UAE’s “course or management,” as U.S. legislation defines brokers for overseas governments.
Sam Nitze, a prosecutor, countered in a rebuttal that Emirati officers have been “thrilled” at Barrack’s feedback concerning the nation and its leaders throughout tv interviews. Nitze mentioned the legislation was designed to verify the U.S. authorities knew when somebody was appearing as a “mouthpiece” for a overseas authorities.
Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Modifying by Will Dunham and William Maclean
: .