WASHINGTON — A majority of Individuals assist banning all tobacco merchandise, in response to a brand new ballot printed by researchers on the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention.
The survey, which was printed Thursday within the peer-reviewed journal Stopping Continual Illness, requested 6,455 folks nationwide: “To what extent would you assist a coverage to ban the sale of all tobacco merchandise?” A bit of over 57% of respondents stated they’d assist such a coverage.
The findings are putting on condition that few tobacco management teams and tobacco-critical legislators are publicly pushing for a complete ban on tobacco. As a substitute, most legislative effort has been directed at banning solely flavored tobacco merchandise. Over 360 localities have handed legal guidelines banning flavored merchandise, in response to information from the Marketing campaign for Tobacco-Free Children. Simply two localities — Beverly Hills and Manhattan Seaside, Calif. — have banned all tobacco gross sales.
commercial
Supporters of a full-scale tobacco ban argued that the findings are proof that tobacco management advocates have to push for such a change, which was as soon as seen as radical.
“The general public is forward of policymakers and even public well being on this problem,” stated Ruth Malone, a researcher on the tobacco trade on the College of California, San Francisco, and the editor-in-chief of the journal Tobacco Management. “We should be daring and we should be braver. There’s a whole lot of anxiousness over calling for one thing daring like this.”
commercial
“Public well being leaders have to have a backbone,” Malone added.
There’s scant information accessible measuring how the American public’s assist for a full-scale tobacco ban has developed, although consultants advised STAT that accessible information suggests assist for the coverage seems to be rising over time.
A 1968 ballot performed on behalf of the tobacco trade, for instance, discovered that solely 13% of Individuals believed {that a} regulation needs to be handed banning cigarettes. A 2018 Gallup ballot discovered that 25% of Individuals surveyed believed that smoking needs to be made fully unlawful. Nevertheless, it’s troublesome to check the outcomes of that Gallup survey to the brand new CDC information, which requested about banning the sale of cigarettes, not making the act of smoking unlawful.
“This can be a massive shift from just a few years in the past, when it was onerous to seek out anybody prepared to speak concerning the finish of tobacco,” stated Robert Proctor, a professor of historical past at Stanford College who has argued for ending the sale of tobacco merchandise.
“I bear in mind once we had been tarred as ‘prohibitionists,’” added John Banzhaf, professor emeritus of regulation at George Washington College, who based the anti-tobacco group Motion on Smoking and Well being within the Nineteen Sixties.
The findings are additionally in keeping with latest polling from different nations, which present sizable assist for ending the sale of tobacco merchandise — even amongst individuals who use them. A 2015 survey discovered that almost 50% of people who smoke in Hong Kong supported a complete ban on tobacco. A 2018 survey of E.U. residents discovered that 40% of people who smoke and up to date quitters supported a complete ban on tobacco inside 10 years. In the meantime, a 2013 survey of New Zealanders discovered that 46% p.c of people who smoke supported banning cigarettes inside 10 years.
The brand new CDC information exhibits, nonetheless, that there’s much less assist within the U.S. for banning all tobacco merchandise amongst customers of tobacco merchandise. Solely about one-quarter of present people who smoke surveyed stated they’d assist banning all tobacco merchandise.
The findings prompted pushback from one public well being knowledgeable, who argued that whereas a ban on tobacco merchandise would in concept enhance public well being, it might be not possible to implement.
“Prohibitions don’t work. They by no means do, they by no means will, they by no means have,” stated Jasjit Ahluwalia, a professor of medication at Brown College. “As a substitute of banning it … why don’t we assist folks give up smoking [and] why don’t we forestall folks from beginning?”
The brand new ballot additionally doesn’t ask respondents whether or not they really feel otherwise about banning several types of tobacco merchandise, comparable to banning vapes — which typically carry decrease well being dangers — versus banning flamable cigarettes.
“What can we imply by tobacco merchandise?” requested Ahluwalia, who has argued that the Meals and Drug Administration ought to authorize extra e-cigarettes to assist people who smoke give up flamable cigarettes.
The brand new ballot additionally confirmed strikingly giant assist for banning menthol cigarettes, together with amongst Black Individuals, the racial group that mostly makes use of menthol cigarettes.
The survey discovered that 62% of individuals surveyed supported banning menthol cigarettes, together with 61.5% of Black Individuals.
The FDA has proposed banning menthol cigarettes as a result of the flavour additive makes it simpler to start out smoking, significantly for younger folks, and tougher to give up. Regulators launched a plan final April to ban all menthol cigarettes nationwide. That proposal, which is at present in draft type, nonetheless must be finalized by regulators, and certain would face a immediate authorized problem from the cigarette trade.
Robin Koval, CEO of the Reality Initiative, stated in a press release that the findings “ought to give a inexperienced mild to the FDA and the Biden Administration to maneuver swiftly to finalize the proposed rule to ban menthol in cigarettes.”
STAT’s protection of power well being points is supported by a grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies. Our monetary supporters usually are not concerned in any choices about our journalism.
Get your every day dose of well being and drugs each weekday with STAT’s free e-newsletter Morning Rounds. Enroll right here.
1 Comment
HERE’S WHY AMERICANS WANT THE BAN
FIRST – Perhaps the most important is the growing recognition that secondhand tobacco smoke kills (over 41,000 Americans annually), disables, and otherwise damages the heath of those unfortunate enough to be around a smoker, including innocent children. As the New York Times reported “at least 6,200 children die each year in the United States because of their parents’ smoking.” So the great majority of Americans have a strong interest in the protecting their own health, as well as the health of children and other nonsmokers.
SECOND – There’s also a growing recognition that smoking imposes huge costs on the majority of Americans who are nonsmokers; an estimated $900 billion annually in higher taxes, inflated prices for goods and services, and bloated health insurance premiums. Nonsmokers logically are sick and tired of bearing most of those unnecessary costs.
THIRD – Although once popular among many highly visible and influential Americans – e.g. TV and movie stars, athletes, political figures, important voices in the media, etc. – smoking is now largely confined to the lower classes who are less influential in upholding its popularity, much less is opposing bans, higher taxes, and other restrictions.
FOURTH – The huge multi-state tobacco settlement which ended law suits by the majority of states against the major tobacco companies mandated the dismemberment of the powerful and very influential Tobacco Institute which had served as the voice of smokers – very effectively opposing any restrictions on the sale of cigarettes – for many years. With its major defender silent, public opposition to smoking and to the sale of tobacco products has not surprisingly continued to rise, says Banzhaf.
FIFTH – Even major tobacco companies have recently been pressured to run ads claiming that they would like to reduce (if not eliminate) smoking. If these companies can’t support the continued sale of their own tobacco products, why should the public, asks the law professor.
SIXTH – With the growing concern and emphasis on protecting the environment and slashing global warming, Americans logically oppose the continued growing – much less the government support for the growing – of a major crop which provides no nutritional benefit, and addicts millions of children every year.
The CDC reminds us that “Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease, disability, and death in the United States” – dwarfing deaths due to crime, guns, fentanyl and other illegal drugs, motor vehicle accidents, defective products, air pollution, and most other causes.
So a ban on the sale of tobacco products would save more lives than virtually any other single governmental action, save more money for taxpayers and for the economy than virtually any other measure, and have numerous other benefits.
Meanwhile, those most likely to object are mostly poor people whose deadly habit is heavily subsidized by the objecting majority. and who have little political or other influence, suggests Banzhaf.