Shock rocker Marilyn Manson has fired again at former fiancée Evan Rachel Wooden, claiming her allegations that he bodily and sexually abused her are outright lies.
RadarOnline.com can reveal Manson—actual identify Brian Warner—alleged he is truly the sufferer of his ex’s elaborate plot to destroy his profession.
Manson additional claimed Wooden and her singer pal Illma Gore even used a cast letter allegedly from the FBI to again up their claims.
His accusations have been detailed in authorized paperwork demanding the defamation case towards the 2 ladies be reopened.
The submitting said: “They recruited, pressured, and coached others to make heinous, unfaithful accusations towards Warner; cast a pretend letter from an actual FBI agent to create the false look Warner was beneath FBI investigation and his ‘victims’ have been at risk.”
As RadarOnline.com beforehand reported, in 2021, the Westworld star, 36, accused Manson, 55, of psychological, sexual and bodily abuse. She additionally charged he threatened to rape her eight-year-old son, Jack.
Manson responded by suing Wooden and Gore for intentional infliction of emotional misery and defamation.
A California choose ultimately threw out his lawsuit beneath a state legislation which prevents authorized motion filed by highly effective folks to silence opposition.
A supply near Manson claimed: “Marilyn believes he wasn’t allowed to have his facet of the story heard and is demanding his day in court docket.”
Howard E. King, Manson’s legal professional, claimed Wooden and Gore unfold lies in regards to the singer, obtained private info from his former staff, hacked his private accounts, wrote pretend emails and even “swatted” him, a time period used to explain when cops are despatched to a house for no cause.
He additional accused the choose of ignoring one of many accusers recanted her allegations of abuse, saying she felt pressured by Wooden into mendacity about Manson.
New York legal professional Peter J. Gleason, who is just not representing any celebration within the case, famous Wooden may face “severe repercussions” if the FBI letter proves to be a forgery.
He added: “She may face prosecution. Because it’s an FBI doc, she’d be up towards the Division of Justice and all its sources.”
However the actress’ rep stated: “As Ms. Wooden testified beneath oath, she didn’t fabricate or forge the FBI letter, and she or he has by no means pressured anybody to make false accusations towards Warner.”
Wooden and Manson are additionally battling it out after a choose dominated he wanted to cowl the $387k in authorized payments she racked up defending herself.
He alleges the quantity needs to be significantly lowered as a result of the billing submitted by his ex was obscure and stuffed with redactions.
Wooden’s staff fired again in a movement writing: “[Manson] tries to evade his obligation to reimburse Wooden for her attorneys’ charges by arguing that the billing data submitted embody redactions and purported “block-billing” or obscure time entries. [Manson’s] complaints are a lot ado about nothing.”