Most bosses are defeating makes an attempt up to now this 12 months to tamp down their pay.
The query now could be whether or not Tesla CEO Elon Musk can do the identical.
Simply two firms out of 340 that held shareholder votes on CEO pay as of June 6 had their govt pay packages rejected, in response to ISS-Company, a enterprise that’s separate from the ISS unit that recommends votes for or in opposition to such proposals.
That failure fee of 0.6% is decrease than any full 12 months since 2020, when pay rejections ranged from 2% to almost 5% of all firms holding such votes.
No pay vote in 2024 has obtained extra public consideration than the one occurring June 13 at Tesla, the place shareholders will resolve whether or not the boss will get to maintain a record-breaking $56 billion compensation package deal that was awarded in 2018 after which voided this 12 months by a Delaware choose.
Critics say the outsized compensation needs to be voted down, provided that it eclipses the best US CEO pay final 12 months 300 instances over and would dilute shareholder worth. It obtained help from 73% of Tesla’s unbiased shareholders when it was first granted six years in the past.
High proxy advisers ISS and Glass Lewis have really helpful shareholders vote in opposition to the pay package deal. One massive shareholder, billionaire Ron Baron, has argued for approval as a result of Musk “earned his pay.”
Shareholder satisfaction
Musk would possibly take some solace from the truth that many CEOs have been profitable up to now this 12 months at maintaining their compensation awards intact regardless of some pushback.
This elevated shareholder satisfaction with govt pay comes as compensation continues to rise. Median pay for S&P 500 CEOs jumped to $16 million in 2023 from $14 million in 2022.
It might appear counterintuitive that help for these “say-on-pay” proposals is so low in 2024 amid traditionally excessive govt pay, stated ISS-Company vp Stephanie Hollinger.
“One doable rationalization is that, in contrast to the previous two years the place the pandemic brought on a shift in conventional compensation practices, fewer issuers supplied one-time awards and different discretionary changes in 2023,” Hollinger stated.
Two firms the place CEOs saved their pay regardless of aggressive challenges have been cash administration agency BlackRock (BLK) and pharmaceutical big AstraZeneca (AZN).
Roughly one-third of AstraZeneca’s shareholders opposed an 11% pay bump together with performance-based perks for CEO Pascal Soriot. Soriot’s compensation, which reached $23.5 million in 2023, had confronted opposition from ISS and Glass Lewis, in addition to institutional traders, over the previous a number of years.
At BlackRock, the vote was a lot nearer. Simply 58% of stockholders voted in favor of awards for CEO Larry Fink and different executives.
The identical didn’t maintain true at 3M (MMM) or Zebra Applied sciences (ZBRA), the uncommon examples of firms that weren’t in a position to win sufficient shareholder help.
Throughout 3M’s annual stakeholder assembly final month, 54% of traders voted down administration proposals to extend sure C-suite pay, together with a elevate for former CEO Mike Roman from $14 million to $16.4 million.
ISS and Glass Lewis additionally put their weight behind that “no” vote, citing 3M’s ongoing authorized and monetary entanglements tied to “ceaselessly chemical compounds.”
At Zebra, 60% of traders stated no to a bump in pay for CEO William Burns.
‘Motivating somebody like Elon’
At Tesla, Musk’s supporters are lobbying laborious within the last days earlier than the vote June 13.
Baron, the billionaire investor and outstanding Tesla stockholder, wrote in an open letter asserting that Musk’s $56 billion pay package deal needs to be accredited due to his accomplishments for the corporate and appreciation of Tesla’s inventory worth through the years.
“Elon is the final word ‘key man’ of key man threat,” Baron wrote. “With out his relentless drive and uncompromising requirements, there could be no Tesla. Particularly contemplating how he slept on the ground of Tesla’s Fremont manufacturing unit when the corporate was going by way of what he referred to as ‘manufacturing hell!'”
Had Musk didn’t fulfill the pay deal’s escalating income and market cap necessities, his stock-option-based CEO compensation would have been zero.
Baron famous that when Musk’s authentic pay package deal of inventory and inventory choices was accredited by shareholders in March 2018, Tesla’s market cap stood at $53.5 billion.
As of June 4, Tesla’s market cap is $550.75 billion, and hit a excessive of $1.24 trillion in November 2021.
Baron additionally took intention on the legal professionals who efficiently sued in Delaware to void Musk’s compensation, mentioning that they requested the courtroom to approve $5.6 billion in charges paid in Tesla inventory.
“Does anybody truthfully imagine the motivation of the plaintiff and his legal professionals was to serve the very best pursuits of Tesla and its shareholders?” Baron wrote.
On Friday, Tesla filed courtroom paperwork arguing that the shareholder’s legal professionals ought to as an alternative obtain as little as $13.6 million in charges.
Tesla’s board chair Robyn Denholm additionally made her last pitch to shareholders this previous week, asking them in a June 5 letter to ponder what it takes to “inspire” Musk.
“If Tesla is to retain Elon’s consideration and inspire him to proceed to commit his time, vitality, ambition and imaginative and prescient to ship comparable outcomes sooner or later, we should stand by our deal,” Denholm wrote.
“Motivating somebody like Elon requires one thing completely different,” she added.
Alexis Keenan is a authorized reporter for Yahoo Finance. Comply with Alexis on Twitter @alexiskweed.
Click on right here for in-depth evaluation of the most recent inventory market information and occasions shifting inventory costs.
Learn the most recent monetary and enterprise information from Yahoo Finance