LEADER of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s assault on the Election Fee, in a chunk in The Indian Specific Saturday, reiterates allegations he has made prior to now and contradicts Maharashtra Meeting election knowledge the ballot panel has launched.
A scrutiny by The Indian Specific of his allegations and knowledge round every exhibits that Gandhi’s criticism selectively cites information, ignores essential context and, in a single case, even attracts a connection the place none exists.
Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was unavailable for remark. Nonetheless, a senior EC official stated: “After dropping the match, blaming the referee has turn into normal follow. These allegations are absurd and a bid to defame the ballot physique. ECI has responded to INC on 24 December 2024 on the identical points. It looks as if the get together has not shared the reply with him (Gandhi).”
Contemplate:
🔴 Appointment of Election Commissioners: Gandhi questioned the federal government’s determination to interchange the Chief Justice of India (CJI) with a Cupboard Minister on the panel liable for appointing Election Commissioners—over-riding a 2023 Supreme Courtroom ruling and elevating issues in regards to the neutrality of the choice course of.
The very fact is that successive governments throughout get together strains—together with the UPA—had alternatives to institutionalise a extra clear appointment mechanism however failed to take action.
As an example, in 2007, the Administrative Reforms Fee, chaired by Congress chief M. Veerappa Moily, really helpful a collegium system for appointing Election Commissioners, citing the “far-reaching significance” of the EC. The ARC proposed a range panel comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Chief of the Opposition, Regulation Minister, and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman. Nonetheless, this advice was by no means carried out.
Story continues under this advert
Nor was the same proposal made by the twentieth Regulation Fee, headed by Justice A.P. Shah, which submitted its report back to the NDA authorities in 2015.
“Now for the primary time, a legislation made by Parliament below Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is healthier—the sooner system or the brand new one? Now, there’s session, there’s transparency and there’s a idea of majority,” a senior EC official stated.
🔴 Enhance in new voters: Gandhi flagged what he known as an “unimaginable leap” of 41 lakh new voters added in Maharashtra inside 5 months between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Meeting elections—nearly equal to the quantity added over the earlier 5 years—suggesting attainable manipulation of the voter rolls.
Nonetheless, below election legal guidelines, political events are concerned at each stage of making ready the ultimate electoral roll. Election authorities frequently maintain conferences with political events, present them free copies of draft and remaining rolls, and publish these on official web sites. Through the abstract revision interval, weekly lists of additives and deletions are shared to permit objections.
Story continues under this advert
Forward of the 2024 Maharashtra Meeting election, 1,03,727 booth-level brokers (BLAs) have been appointed by political events, together with 27,099 from the Congress. These brokers are liable for interacting with election officers to flag any discrepancies on the polling station stage.
But, throughout this revision, fewer than 100 appeals pertaining to additions or deletions have been filed by get together brokers throughout all events.
🔴 Voter turnout: Gandhi questioned the reported voter turnout soar from 58.22% at 5 pm on November 20, 2024, to 66.05% the next morning—a rise of seven.83 proportion factors, or about 76 lakh voters. He known as the rise unprecedented, noting that within the 2019 Maharashtra polls, the distinction between provisional and remaining turnout was solely 0.64 proportion factors.
The very fact is that the ballot watchdog has all the time handled turnout figures launched on polling day as provisional—and for good motive. Polling officers prioritise the integrity of the voting course of over real-time reporting, and delays in updates are widespread.
Story continues under this advert
Earlier than the Voter Turnout app, the EC would transient media round 6 pm on polling day, with officers constantly stating that the 5 pm figures have been tentative, as voting usually prolonged past the official deadline. On this context, the hole between the provisional turnout reported at 5 pm and the ultimate determine launched the following morning will not be uncommon—particularly when in comparison with earlier elections.
On Saturday, the Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer’s workplace clarified that the distinction between provisional and remaining voter turnout figures in 2024 was common when in comparison with 2019. In 2019, turnout rose from roughly 54.43% at 5 pm to 61.10% remaining; in 2024, it rose from 58.22% to 66.05%. The CEO’s workplace stated remaining figures are based mostly on official information (Type 17C), supplied to polling brokers for verification.
It additionally identified that Gandhi’s knowledge comparability was flawed: for 2019, he used provisional turnout figures recorded on the precise finish of polling—which can have prolonged past 6 pm—alongside the ultimate figures. However for 2024, he in contrast the 5 pm provisional turnout (earlier than polling had ended) with the ultimate numbers.
Additional, EC officers stated that in 2024, a mean of 58 lakh voters forged their votes each hour in Maharashtra. Primarily based on this, 116 lakh voters may have voted within the final two hours alone—making the rise of 76 lakh voters utterly believable.
Story continues under this advert
🔴 ‘Bogus’ Voting: Gandhi additional alleged that the surge in voter turnout was concentrated in 12,000 cubicles throughout 85 constituencies the place the BJP had fared poorly within the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and related this to positive aspects made by the BJP within the Meeting polls. He cited Kamthi Meeting seat for example, claiming BJP’s votes rose from 1.19 lakh within the Lok Sabha election to 1.75 lakh within the Meeting ballot, whereas Congress figures remained principally steady.
Nonetheless, the EC permits candidates and their polling brokers full entry to all polling cubicles to boost objections in actual time. Even after outcomes are declared, candidates might problem the result by submitting election petitions in Excessive Courtroom.
Congress candidate Suresh Yadavrao Bhoyar, who contested from Kamthi Meeting seat, has not filed such a petition. Of the 112 election petitions filed throughout Maharashtra, solely 28 are from Congress—and Kamthi will not be amongst them.
When requested about Gandhi’s declare, a Maharashtra CEO official stated it was factually incorrect. Kamthi falls below the Ramtek Lok Sabha seat, which was contested by Shiv Sena within the basic election—not the BJP. “Subsequently, the query of the BJP receiving 1.19 lakh votes in Kamthi throughout the Lok Sabha polls doesn’t come up,” the official stated.
Story continues under this advert
The officer additionally identified that Bhoyar obtained 1,07,064 votes in 2019 and 1,34,033 in 2024, a rise in assist.
🔴 ‘Concealing’ proof: Accusing the Election Fee of responding with “silence and even aggression,” Rahul Gandhi stated requests to entry voter rolls from the Lok Sabha and Meeting elections have been denied, and that the ballot watchdog has additionally refused to supply videography and CCTV footage of the polling course of in Maharashtra.
Electoral rolls—lists of registered voters—are already obtainable to political events. What can’t be shared is the record of those that truly voted, as this could violate the “secrecy of voting,” a foundational precept in guaranteeing free and honest elections, a prime official stated. It’s for that reason the EC supplies personal voting compartments for every voter. Disclosing post-poll attendance may expose voters to intimidation or strain.
On CCTV footage, it’s a undeniable fact that in December 2024, the EC—after consultations with the Centre—amended the Conduct of Election Guidelines, 1961, to limit entry to digital information. This adopted a Punjab and Haryana Excessive Courtroom directive ordering the EC to share footage with advocate Mehmood Pracha. The Fee has argued that offering CCTV footage would quantity to violation of secrecy of vote and open it as much as potential misuse utilizing synthetic intelligence.
Story continues under this advert
Requested about this, an official within the State CEO workplace stated, “In case of any grievance or objection associated to the election course of, the Illustration of the Individuals Act, 1951, below Part 80, supplies a authorized possibility within the type of an Election Petition, which can be filed earlier than the Hon’ble Excessive Courtroom. If the Courtroom deems it needed throughout the proceedings of such a petition, the related digital or documentary proof associated to the election course of is produced earlier than the Courtroom as per its directives.”