The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday rejected the vehement submissions of few convicts {that a} two-judge bench can not hear their appeals towards conviction because the matter pertained to the award of demise penalty to 11 accused within the 2002 Godhra practice burning case.
Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, showing for 2 convicts, informed a bench comprising Justices J Ok Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar that it has been held within the Purple Fort terror assault case, through which Mohammad Arif alias Ashfaq was handed down the demise penalty, {that a} three-judge bench has to listen to instances pertaining to award of the capital punishment.
“Suppose, this bench of two judges decides to award demise penalty to some accused then it needs to be re-argued earlier than one other bench of three judges,” the senior lawyer stated.
A Structure bench of the apex court docket had in its September 2014 judgement concluded that in all instances through which demise sentence was awarded by the excessive court docket, such issues be listed earlier than a bench of three judges.
Dismissing the submissions, the bench referred to related Supreme Court docket guidelines and the judgement, and stated a three-judge bench has to listen to appeals in instances the place the excessive courts have both confirmed demise penalty or awarded it after listening to the appeals of events.
“The Gujarat Excessive Court docket, within the current case, commuted the demise penalty of 11 convicts into life imprisonment and didn’t award the demise penalty…The trial court docket had awarded the demise penalty on this case,” Justice Maheshwari stated, including the rule and the apex court docket judgement didn’t bar listening to of the appeals within the current case by a two-judge bench.
“The objection is repelled,” the bench stated and commenced the ultimate listening to within the case.
Story continues beneath this advert
Earlier on April 24, the highest court docket stated it can begin closing listening to on Could 6 and seven on the appeals filed by the Gujarat authorities and a number of other different convicts within the 2002 Godhra practice burning case.
On February 27, 2002, 59 individuals have been killed when the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Categorical was burnt at Gujarat’s Godhra, triggering riots within the state.
A number of appeals have been filed within the apex court docket difficult the October 2017 verdict of the Gujarat Excessive Court docket which had upheld the conviction of a number of convicts and commuted the demise penalties of 11 individuals to life time period.
The excessive court docket had upheld the 31 convictions within the case and commuted the demise penalties of the 11 convicts to life time period, the counsel had stated.
Story continues beneath this advert
Whereas the state has appealed towards the commutation of demise penalty to life time period for the 11 convicts, a number of convicts have challenged the excessive court docket’s verdict upholding their convictions within the case.