A former juror within the Scott Peterson homicide trial has spoken out, discrediting the killer’s newest try and blame his spouse’s killing on close by burglars.
In 2004, Mike Belmessieri and 11 different jurors discovered Scott responsible of murdering his then 8-month-pregnant spouse, Laci Peterson.
Throughout the preliminary trial, Scott’s legal professional, Mark Geragos, claimed a housebreaking close to the couple’s Modesto, California, residence across the time of Laci’s disappearance could have been related to her dying. Nonetheless, the juror has now revealed that the cops who labored on the 2002 break-in case discovered no connection between the 2 crimes.
“The Modesto [Police Department] had investigated that concern and cleared these people who had been concerned in that housebreaking,” the juror stated in an interview with NewsNation.
Scott’s attorneys at the moment are requesting objects from the housebreaking investigation to assist exonerate the convicted killer. They’re particularly asking for proof recovered from the burglarized house, a lacking watch that Laci wore, objects from a van that was set ablaze in Modesto the day after she disappeared, and paperwork related to witness interviews.
The Los Angeles Innocence Undertaking, a professional bono authorized group that helps convicts, introduced earlier this week that they are going to be taking on Scott’s case. They’ve additionally filed a movement requesting DNA testing of proof from the unique trial.
Scott, who started an affair with therapeutic massage therapist Amber Frey a month earlier than his spouse disappeared, has constantly pleaded not responsible to homicide and maintains his innocence. Though his authentic dying sentence was overturned, the 51-year-old is presently serving a life sentence.
He testified in courtroom that he had gone fishing on the Berkeley Marina the morning of her disappearance.
By no means miss a narrative — join the RadarOnline.com e-newsletter to get your every day dose of dope. Day by day. Breaking. Superstar information. All free.
Of their efforts to safe a brand new trial for Scott, his attorneys introduced consideration to one of many jurors, Richelle Good. They alleged she hid very important info and had been untruthful about her private life through the jury choice course of.
It was later revealed that Richelle had been the sufferer of home violence and sought a restraining order in 2000 out of concern for her unborn kid’s security.
Regardless of assertions on the contrary, courtroom paperwork famous that a number of of her solutions in a juror questionnaire had been discovered to be false. Nonetheless, they had been deemed to not be motivated by bias in opposition to the defendant.
Peterson’s request for a brand new trial was denied in 2022. Nonetheless, with the involvement of the Los Angeles Innocence Undertaking, there may be new curiosity within the case.