Might 3 2024, Printed 8:00 a.m. ET
Halsey demanded sanctions in opposition to her former nanny for making “empty guarantees” of their bitter court docket conflict.
In line with court docket paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, the entertainer requested the court docket to compel her ex-employee Ashley Funches to finish her deposition.
Article continues beneath commercial
Funches sat for a deposition on March 12, 2024, however they agreed she would come again for an additional day. Halsey stated her authorized crew has tried to schedule a date with Funches and her crew, however they’ve been given the run-around.
Halsey stated her ex-nanny lately canceled a depo scheduled for Might 8.
Article continues beneath commercial
Article continues beneath commercial
“[Funches] continues to be noncommittal or outright ignore [Halsey’s] requests to finish [Funches’] deposition,” the movement learn.
Halsey stated she has made “good religion efforts to coordinate [Funches’] deposition for months, and it’s nonetheless not full. Protection counsel has tried on numerous events to safe and ensure the deposition of [Funches] however has been met with silence or empty guarantees.”
Article continues beneath commercial
The singer stated she doesn’t need the case to pull on any longer. She requested the court docket to compel Funches to look on Might 8 to finish her deposition.
As well as, Halsey demanded sanctions in opposition to Funches for her actions.
MORE ON:
Halsey
Article continues beneath commercial
As RadarOnline.com beforehand reported, in 2022, Funches sued Halsey for wrongful termination and incapacity discrimination.
Funches was employed to work as Halsey’s live-in nanny, in keeping with the swimsuit. The nanny was chargeable for caring for the singer’s new child son Ender.
Article continues beneath commercial
Article continues beneath commercial
In her swimsuit, Funches accused Halsey of not paying her correct additional time. She stated she complained concerning the challenge whereas employed. She stated Halsey fired her after she requested for break day for a medical process.
Funches’ lawyer stated Halsey “illegally and wrongfully terminated [Funches] in retaliation for complaining about” the singer’s “unlawful and illegal apply of failing to pay her additional time wages and on the premise of her incapacity and/or perceived incapacity.”
Article continues beneath commercial
Halsey’s rep scoffed on the allegations. She stated, “These allegations are baseless. This particular person’s employment was lately terminated in response to particular incidents by which Halsey’s toddler was left unsupervised in an unsafe location whereas beneath the nanny’s care, and it was found the nanny was intoxicated whereas the kid was in her care.”
Article continues beneath commercial
They added, “Moreover, at no time throughout this particular person’s time period of employment with Halsey had been any complaints even raised. Consequently, whereas Halsey is each saddened and disenchanted by this flip of occasions, they really feel it is very important refute these allegations publicly, as they take ableism and moral working situations very severely.”
A decide has but to rule on Halsey’s movement to compel Funches’ deposition.