Tesla Chairwoman Robyn Denholm, who’s one in every of Fortune’s Most Highly effective Girls, did not mince phrases as she pushed again in opposition to a Delaware decide’s criticism of the board’s—in addition to her personal—oversight of CEO Elon Musk.
In an interview with the Monetary Occasions, she addressed Musk’s historic compensation bundle that is value greater than $50 billion and a Delaware courtroom’s January ruling that voided it, with the decide calling the board’s oversight “lackadaisical.”
The decide additionally singled out Australia-based Denholm, saying she too was “lackadaisical” and suggesting she wasn’t goal sufficient because of the “life-changing” windfall of $280 million she made by promoting Tesla inventory choices in 2021 and 2022.
“That’s crap,” Denholm informed the FT. “I needed to lookup that phrase . . . I’ll inform you, anyone who is aware of me, is aware of that I’m not lackadaisical, now that I do know what that phrase means. It’s most likely the furthest from the reality. I’m actually intense and really diligent in what I do.”
She justified her inventory awards by echoing the protection of Musk’s compensation bundle, saying shares have climbed as the corporate’s efficiency improved.
Denholm added that slightly than clouding her objectivity, the immense wealth from the sale of her inventory choices has boosted her independence.
“If I didn’t agree with one thing that was happening on the firm, I may stroll away tomorrow,” she mentioned. “The truth that you’ve bought shares makes you extra financially impartial.”
And for good measure, she referred to as the Delaware decide’s declare that she’s too near Musk “absolute BS.”
Tesla named Denholm to the board in 2014 and tapped her as chair in 2018, after Musk’s notorious “funding secured” tweet that mentioned he was taking the corporate personal at $420 a share.
In a settlement with the Securities and Trade Fee over the tweet, Musk needed to step down as chair, pay a wonderful, and get approval for tweets from a Tesla lawyer.
Denholm acknowledged to the FT that “we’ve got powerful conversations about tweets” however rejected the notion that she is Musk’s babysitter.
“To me, the function of the chair is absolutely to verify the board has a very good relationship with the CEO and the manager crew,” she mentioned. “We’re there on behalf of shareholders to ensure that administration is doing their job, and their job is primarily to develop shareholder worth over time.”
Extra lately, she and different board members have been attempting to win over shareholders forward of Tesla’s annual assembly on June 13, which may show crucial to the way forward for the corporate. Actually, regardless of Musk’s aversion to advertising, Tesla has even purchased advertisements to influence shareholders to help Tesla’s transfer to reincorporate in Texas—and ratify Musk’s report pay bundle from 2018.
In a proxy assertion inviting shareholders to the assembly, Denholm wrote final month {that a} “yea” vote on the pay bundle would “restore Tesla’s stockholder democracy.”
“As a result of the Delaware courtroom second-guessed your determination, Elon has not been paid for any of his work for Tesla for the previous six years that has helped to generate important progress and stockholder worth,” she added, arguing it was a “matter of elementary equity and respect to our CEO.”
The assembly comes throughout a troublesome stretch for Tesla as EV gross sales have slowed amid cutthroat competitors, whereas shares have tumbled from pandemic-era highs and the corporate lays off workers.
This story was initially featured on Fortune.com