A lawyer for the Supreme Courtroom dismissed questions on ethics points on the court docket in a terse reply to a letter from two high congressional Democrats on Monday.
Supreme Courtroom authorized counsel Ethan Torrey replied to the inquiry from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), every accountable for oversight of the courts of their respective chambers.
The 2 congressional investigators had pressed Chief Justice John Roberts to reply questions on how the court docket handles moral breaches after information studies revealed a stress marketing campaign by the Christian conservative group Religion & Motion that allegedly resulted in Justice Samuel Alito revealing the result of his 2014 choice in Burwell v. Pastime Foyer previous to its launch.
Torrey didn’t reply any of Whitehouse and Johnson’s questions relating to ongoing or potential ethics inquiries into the court docket’s leaked draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, or into Alito’s alleged leak of the Pastime Foyer consequence. Nor did he say which justices acquired presents as a part of the spiritual proper stress marketing campaign.
Torrey as an alternative takes the tone of a protection counsel stonewalling an investigative physique.
“There may be nothing to recommend that Justice Alito’s actions violated moral requirements,” he wrote.
Torrey’s letter merely restates Alito’s denial of the alleged leak, saying that The New York Occasions report that the conservative justice leaked the Pastime Foyer consequence to Donald and Gail Wright, two supporters of Religion & Motion, remained “uncorroborated.” He goes on to say that Alito didn’t violate ethics guidelines in accepting meals and lodging from the Wrights as a result of the couple “by no means had a monetary curiosity in a matter earlier than the Courtroom.”
“As well as, the time period ‘reward’ is outlined to exclude social hospitality primarily based on private relationships in addition to modest gadgets, akin to meals and refreshments, supplied as a matter of social hospitality,” Torrey wrote.
Alex Wong through Getty Pictures
In a Nov. 20 letter, Whitehouse and Johnson demanded that Roberts say whether or not the court docket was investigating any side of Religion & Motion’s stress marketing campaign, together with former chief Rev. Rob Schenck’s allegation that Alito had leaked the Pastime Foyer consequence. Schenck had written a letter to Roberts because the chief justice was investigating the leak of the Dobbs v. Jackson Girls’s Well being Group draft opinion to Politico.
The 2 congressmen additionally wished to know if the court docket had thought-about taking a harder method to inside ethics in gentle of Schenck’s allegation and requested whether or not anybody is accountable for stopping conflicts of curiosity associated to donations to the Supreme Courtroom Historic Society. Schenck claims that he directed his supporters to achieve entry to the justices by donating to the society and attending its annual dinners.
Whitehouse and Johnson additionally requested that Roberts “designate a person educated about” inside court docket ethics points “to offer testimony to us about … points associated to ethics or reporting questions raised about justices’ conduct.”
“If the Courtroom … shouldn’t be keen to undertake fact-finding inquiries into attainable ethics violations that leaves Congress as the one discussion board,” Whitehouse and Johnson asserted.