The Court docket of Arbitration for Sport has deferred its judgement on Vinesh Phogat’s enchantment for a shared silver medal to August 16, the most recent in a collection of postponements by the highest judicial physique in sport.
Phogat was disqualified from the ladies’s 50 kg wrestling class on the second day of competitors as a consequence of being obese by 100 grams, a call that has since introduced scrutiny on United World Wrestling’s (UWW) guidelines in addition to statements from its chief Nenad Lalovic and Worldwide Olympic Committee president Thomas Bach – each of whom said that the foundations had been in place for the protection of athletes they usually stood by the disqualification ruling.
“By software of Article 18 of the CAS arbshashashidditration Guidelines for the Olympic Video games, the President of the CAS Advert Hoc division extends the time restrict for the panel to provide a call till 16 August 2024 at 1800 (Paris time),” a launch from CAS stated.
Phogat’s counsel had earlier submitted statements which centered on the negligible quantity of weight by which she had exceeded the restrict and stated that it didn’t represent a aggressive benefit. The assertion additionally stated that there might be numerous exterior components that might be the explanation for the rise in weight.
“The surplus of 100g is extraordinarily negligible (representing round 0.1 to 0.2 p.c of the athlete’s weight) and may simply be attributable to the bloating of a human physique throughout summer season climate, as the warmth makes the human physique retain extra water, scientifically for survival functions. It can be as a consequence of muscle mass improve because the athlete competed 3 times on the identical day. It can be attributable to the meals consumption of the athlete after the competitions to maintain her well being and integrity for the demanding competitions,” Vinesh’s counsel had submitted.
Her attorneys additionally argued that Phogat’s 100 gram weight improve resulting in her disqualification, constituted a state of affairs the place the punishment was disproportionate to the ‘crime’ dedicated.
“There could be a manifest disproportion between the extent of extra (which excludes any try at fraud or manipulation of the athlete) and the irreversible penalties that might outcome from her non-participation within the finals along with the deprivation of her silver medal that was acquired by exhausting work.”
That is the third deferral made by the CAS on this matter.