Tiger Woods’ ex-girlfriend Erica Herman has pleaded with a choose to rethink his ruling transferring her lawsuit towards the golfer out of the general public eye, RadarOnline.com has realized.
Based on court docket paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, Erica is asking the court docket to set a rehearing and rethink the choice that despatched her case to arbitration.
As we beforehand reported, Erica and Tiger broke up final 12 months after a prolonged romance. The 2 initially met when Erica labored at Tiger’s restaurant in Florida.
She claimed in the course of the relationship he promised she might reside at his Florida mansion for a particular variety of years.
After the break up, she was nonetheless residing within the house. Nevertheless, she claimed his staff tricked her into leaving after which modified the locks. Erica stated there have been 5 years left on the alleged deal. She sued demanding $30 million in damages.
As well as, she filed a separate lawsuit demanding an alleged NDA that Tiger had her signal be thrown out.
Erica argued Tiger had dedicated sexual harassment. “Mr. Woods was Ms. Herman’s boss,’’ her legal professional wrote. “On Mr. Woods’ personal portrayal of occasions, he imposed an NDA on her as a situation to maintain her job when she started having a sexual relationship with him. A boss imposing totally different work circumstances on his worker due to their sexual relationship is sexual harassment.”
She argued the alleged sexual harassment meant the NDA needs to be thrown out. Tiger denied the allegations. He disputed the declare he promised Erica she might reside in his home even when they break up. His lawyer stated, “Ms. Herman’s place is completely meritless.”
Tiger demanded the NDA battle be heard in arbitration, which is a non-public continuing exterior of the general public eye. He stated the NDA contained verbiage that said any disputes can be heard in arbitration, not state court docket.
Just lately, a choose ended up ruling in his favor and despatched the case to arbitration. Nevertheless, now, Erica needs that call reconsidered.
She argued that third-party declarations submitted by Tiger to again up his claims had been filled with “rumour.” Additional, she stated, “all the purported proof was submitted premature in an effort to conduct “trial by ambush” towards [Erica].”
Erica stated the court docket’s ruling relied on Tiger’s witnesses, which she stated mustn’t have occurred.
Tiger has but to reply.