A girl staying at Vanderpump Guidelines star Tom Sandoval’s home was served Rachel Leviss’ revenge porn lawsuit after being approached by a course of server.
In keeping with courtroom paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, the server confirmed up at Sandoval and his ex Ariana Madix’s $2.1 million residence in Valley Village, California on March 12.
The server stated he handed the authorized paperwork to the 40-year-old white feminine — who was 5’5, had brown eyes, and weighed 140 lbs. — at 5:57 PM.
The lady was listed as “Jane Doe” however the server famous the individual was a “competent member of the family.”
Sandoval will now have weeks to answer Leviss’ lawsuit. As we beforehand reported, Leviss demanded unspecified damages from her ex-lover and his ex-girlfriend Madix in her lawsuit.
Within the surprising lawsuit, Leviss claimed throughout her affair with Sandoval — whereas he was with Madix — he recorded FaceTime calls they’d that had been sexual.
She stated Sandoval didn’t inform her he was recording the calls. Leviss claimed Madix discovered the movies and despatched them to her Vanderpump Guidelines co-stars. Leviss claimed Madix confronted her in March 2023 — BEFORE the whole scandal broke within the public. As well as, she accused the manufacturing firm of fostering a hostile work setting for her after the affair was revealed.
Leviss’ powerhouse lawyer Mark Geragos stated, “This lawsuit is squarely about unlawful conduct and those that visitors in it and allow it. Rachel has apologized for her half in an affair. That’s not against the law. Tom and Ariana are alleged right here to have engaged in prison acts. They then doubled down and used these actions to disgrace, bully, belittle, and deliberately attempt to destroy Rachel’s psychological well being.”
Geragos added, “The regulation makes it clear that recording somebody with out their consent and distributing that unlawful recording is punishable by regulation; nevertheless, doing so whereas knowingly engaging them to have interaction in sexual acts deserves the harshest of penalties allowable beneath the regulation.”