NEW YORK, Oct 20 (Reuters) – A U.S. jury discovered on Thursday that Credit score Suisse Group AG (CSGN.S) didn’t conspire with the world’s largest banks to rig costs within the international change market between 2007 and 2013, handing the financial institution a win as it really works to restructure and put a string of scandals behind it.
The case stems from the foreign exchange rigging scandal, which led to worldwide regulatory probes leading to greater than $10 billion in fines for a number of banks.
A Credit score Suisse spokesperson mentioned the financial institution is “extraordinarily happy that the jury agreed with us that plaintiffs’ case had no advantage.”
Credit score Suisse was the final financial institution defendant remaining within the class motion introduced by foreign money traders in 2013, after 15 others reached settlements value $2.31 billion. The traders alleged that Credit score Suisse merchants shared nonpublic pricing info with merchants at different banks.
Throughout the trial in Manhattan federal courtroom which started on Oct. 11, jurors heard testimony that in 2015 5 banks had pleaded responsible to forex-related antitrust conspiracies, and noticed transcripts from chat rooms with names equivalent to “The Cartel” the place traders mentioned merchants colluded.
The jury started deliberations on Wednesday and labored for a complete of round seven hours to succeed in their verdict. They discovered that traders had proved there was a conspiracy to rig costs within the foreign exchange market, however not that it concerned Credit score Suisse.
A lawyer for the traders argued through the trial that chat transcripts had been damning proof of a single conspiracy among the many banks to rig the international foreign money market. Credit score Suisse merchants participated in additional than 100 chat rooms and shared details about the unfold between the purchase and promote value for currencies each different day, he mentioned.
Attorneys for Credit score Suisse argued that such rare communication couldn’t affect the market, that merchants chatting about totally different foreign money pairs couldn’t be a part of the identical conspiracy, and that there was no proof Credit score Suisse merchants ever acted on the chats.
Credit score Suisse in July settled with some traders, together with BlackRock Inc and Allianz SE’s Pimco, which selected to “decide out” of the category litigation. Buyers sometimes do this after they hope to get better extra by suing on their very own. The phrases of the settlement weren’t disclosed.
The decision got here because the Swiss financial institution labored to finalize an overhaul that will seemingly see it pare again a unstable funding financial institution in London and New York to deal with banking for the wealthy in Switzerland.
The case is In Re International Alternate Benchmark Charges Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court docket, Southern District of New York, No. 13-07789.
Reporting by Jody Godoy in New York; Modifying by Andrea Ricci
: .