NEW YORK, March 24 (Reuters) – A U.S. choose on Friday dismissed a former Barclays Plc (BARC.L) dealer’s whistleblower lawsuit accusing the British financial institution of firing him after he complained it ignored fundamental danger administration and violated its personal insurance policies for detecting rogue buying and selling.
U.S. District Choose Paul Oetken in Manhattan mentioned Brian La Belle, who had been Barclays’ head of business actual property buying and selling, couldn’t sue beneath the federal Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowing regulation.
La Belle’s job termination in late July 2018 got here at a time Barclays had been beneath intense scrutiny over its remedy of whistleblowers.
In Could 2018, British regulators fined Jes Staley, then Barclays’ chief govt, about 642,000 kilos as punishment for attempting to unmask a whistleblower. Barclays additionally clawed again 500,000 kilos of Staley’s compensation.
A lot of La Belle’s case involved “necessary block depart,” the place Barclays required some staff to take 10 consecutive enterprise days off with no entry to its computer systems, to forestall wrongdoers from overlaying their tracks.
La Belle, of Hampton, New York, mentioned he was pressured to work twice by way of necessary leaves in 2017, with colleagues calling him on his private cellphone to keep away from detection, solely to be threatened by a supervisor to maintain quiet.
He additionally mentioned Barclays fired him after he reported misconduct internally and to U.S. regulators a couple of weeks earlier regarding two shoppers and one other worker.
Oetken, nevertheless, mentioned Sarbanes-Oxley didn’t typically cowl claims that firms violated inside insurance policies, even when the behaviors had been wrongful.
He additionally mentioned La Belle didn’t present that his firing resulted from his whistleblowing and had “indisputably” been on “skinny ice” by mid-June 2018, when Barclays mentioned it had determined to terminate him.
La Belle’s lawyer Steven Barentzen mentioned his consumer is contemplating all choices. “Whistleblowers like Mr. La Belle who’re retaliated towards for having the braveness to face as much as their employer needs to be protected beneath the regulation,” he mentioned.
Barclays declined to remark.
La Belle had joined Barclays in July 2015 from UBS (UBSG.S), brokerage business data present.
His lawsuit had sought reinstatement, greater than $10 million of back and front pay, and punitive damages.
The case is La Belle v Barclays Capital Inc, U.S. District Court docket, Southern District of New York, No. 19-03800.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Modifying by Invoice Berkrot and Grant McCool
: .