The Air India “urinating” case complainant has slammed accused Shankar Mishra for his newest claims, saying it’s being accomplished with the intent to “unfold misinformation” and additional “harassment”, information company ANI reported.
On Friday, Shankar Mishra had claimed in a Delhi session courtroom that he didn’t commit the offence and alleged that the complainant herself might have peed on her personal seat.
The complainant by her lawyer Ankur Mehindro acknowledged that “it has been dropped at our data that sure scurrilous and defamatory allegations have been made on behalf of the accused throughout a courtroom listening to”.
“Accused, as a substitute of being remorseful for the completely disgusting act dedicated by him, has adopted a marketing campaign of spreading misinformation and falsities with the intent of additional harassing the Sufferer,” the girl complainant mentioned in a press release.
Additionally Learn | Shankar Mishra’s authorized crew pervert like him: Priyanka Chaturvedi on Air India urination case
“Unnecessary to state, the allegations are fully false and concocted and by their very nature are disparaging and derogatory. The mentioned allegations are additionally in full contradiction and an entire volte-face of the statements and the pleaded case of the accused in his Bail Utility,” the assertion added.
Within the periods courtroom, senior advocate Ramesh Gupta, showing for Mishra, accused the police and the press of turning the case right into a joke.
The declare by Mishra’s lawyer, made for the primary time for the reason that sordid occasion unfolded on an Air India New York-New Delhi flight on November 26 final 12 months, flies within the face of denunciation of the accused by a few of the co-passengers and even a string of WhatsApp exchanges he had with the sufferer lady which instructed the unsavoury incident certainly befell.
“I am not the accused. There have to be another person. It appears she herself urinated. She was affected by some illness associated to prostate which a number of ‘kathak dancers’ appear to undergo from. It was not me. The seating system was such that nobody might go to her seat… Her seat might solely be approached from behind, and in any case the urine couldn’t attain to seat’s entrance space. Additionally, the passenger sitting behind the complainant didn’t make any such criticism,” the defence advocate instructed the choose.
The lawyer’s costs have been dismissed by different kathak dancers. The generalisation has enraged many exponents of classical Indian dances, throughout the nation. “It’s an unlucky case and one of the vital weird causes I’ve heard that 80 per cent of kathak dancers have such issues,” mentioned kathak exponent, Padma Shri Shovana Narayan. “In Shankar Mishra’s case, a girl’s modesty is compromised, and that is completely incorrect. We should sympathise with the girl,” she added.
Rashmi Vaidialingam, a lawyer and a Kuchipudi dancer, mentioned, “That is essentially the most ridiculous factor I’ve heard. How can somebody consider one thing like this? There have to be a medical check-up to substantiate, and it looks like the person was drunk and couldn’t management himself. Disgrace on the passengers, crew and all of the eyewitnesses who usually are not reacting strongly to this incident. That is what occurs if you reside in a patriarchal society. The person and his lawyer have give you a ridiculously defensive assertion. Dancers all the time have management over their our bodies, and what does the lawyer find out about this?”
The counsel for the accused made the submission earlier than further periods choose Harjyot Singh Bhalla whereas arguing in opposition to a Delhi Police petition in search of revision of an order handed by a magisterial courtroom denying police his custodial interrogation.
The choose disposed of the appliance, saying the submissions made earlier than him didn’t appear to have been made in entrance of the metropolitan Justice of the Peace. He mentioned police can method the magisterial courtroom with its software afresh.
(With inputs from companies)