Former world champion Vladimir Kramnik, who always raises questions on dishonest in chess, posted a web based ballot on his X deal with about dishonest. However it turned out to be a self-inflicted blunder.
Prior to now, the Russian has implied that grandmasters like Hikaru Nakamura have cheated in video games. Kramnik’s techniques have been controversial, with the Russian posting statistics on his X account that title gamers to suggest wrongdoing. He has additionally despatched a number of emails to chess app Chess.com about on-line dishonest in chess.
The newest ballot, which nonetheless has a number of hours to finish, from Kramnik was additionally concerning on-line dishonest. However up to now, it has thrown up shocking outcomes, no less than for the previous world champion.
“Who’s doing most harm to chess these days,” requested Kramnik on X.
The 4 ballot choices he supplied had been:
Cheaters;
Constructions masking them;
Gamers silent about it;
You, I help cheaters.
With 5 hours left for ballot to finish, 2892 individuals had voted. An amazing majority of that (48 per cent) had voted for the final possibility which said that they thought that Kramnik was doing essentially the most harm to chess.
Right here’s what the opposite choices obtained: Cheaters (23 per cent), Constructions masking them (19 per cent), Gamers silent about it (20 per cent).
Who’s doing most harm to chess these days
— Vladimir Kramnik (@VBkramnik) January 31, 2025
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Kramnik’s campaign towards dishonest
The previous world champion performed — and misplaced — towards GM Jose Martinez, in a match known as ‘The Conflict of Claims’ in Madrid. The Conflict Of Claims was a three-day match in June final yr performed on the On line casino Gran By way of in Madrid to settle a dispute between the 2 gamers about alleged dishonest on Martinez’s half. He beat Kramnik 14.5-11.5, with two video games to spare, shedding 6.5-7.5 over the board earlier than profitable 8-4 on-line.
Story continues under this advert
Nonetheless, Kramnik disputed this end result as properly, citing technical points which he claimed had invalidated the competition.
This led to a rematch, known as ‘The Conflict of Blames’ in August final yr the place the previous world champion prevailed 19-17 of their 36-game Conflict of Blames blitz match in London.
© IE On-line Media Companies Pvt Ltd