It isn’t misogyny that defeated Kamala Harris. There’s a sure insincerity lurking behind this clarification for the decisive victory of the Republican Social gathering, which has led to the set up of Donald Trump, as soon as once more, within the White Home.
It’s the identical insincerity with which the Harris-Walz marketing campaign was carried out for months. Within the face of an ‘sudden’ debacle, the Democrats within the US, together with different politicians the world over, will do nicely to introspect. What, certainly, was the issue?
It’s straightforward to make use of feminism to clarify away Trump’s conquer two girls in lower than a decade. What’s being forgotten simply right here is the truth that she was recruited in a huff to exchange Joe Biden, who was certain to have misplaced to Trump. An afterthought. The Democrats had been determined to combat anti-incumbency however addressed it from the unsuitable finish.
A Guilt Bait
Harris was utilized by her social gathering as guilt-inducing bait within the 2024 presidential election, and her defeat has necessary classes for everybody. First and most clearly, you can not guilt-trip voters into supporting you unconditionally. The Harris-Walz marketing campaign doubled down on making the undecided voter really feel guilt-ridden for even contemplating a change. There was a whole lack of self-awareness on the a part of marketing campaign designers and ideological Democrat voters that their insurance policies could have something to do with individuals’s dissatisfaction. Or they knew and smugly brushed it off, armed with weapons of collective guilt. This smugness triggered a swing.
Essentially the most palpable instance of that is the Democrats’ tone-deafness across the struggle in West Asia. In a yr marked by relentless anti-war campaigns and demonstrations, Democrats believed Dick Cheney to be their trump card. Cheney’s hawkish perspective as George W. Bush’s vice-president left a legacy of violence and human rights violations within the US and in every single place else the nation intervened militarily. Harris’s claims to usher in peace fell flat within the face of such crude irony. Relying on how dissatisfied or offended they had been, anti-war Democrats sat the election out, cross-voted for Trump, or voted for the third various to mark their dissent.
Thick Cosmopolitanism
Democrats’ adaptation of what political scientists name the speculation of ‘thick cosmopolitanism’ within the home area of immigration didn’t work in securing them a consecutive second time period. The idea argues that when individuals realise their ingroup’s culpability in inflicting hurt to individuals dwelling in distant nations, they undertake a cosmopolitan serving to manner. The inherent limitation of the speculation, as demonstrated by Nicholas Faulkner, and the revelation of Democrats’ hypocrisy ensured that voters rejected their guilt-tripping political marketing campaign. This will likely partially clarify why a considerable diaspora cohort swung in direction of Trump.
However Democrats had been relying on brow-beating dissent with guilt. Sadly for them, this technique backfired. Students Gunn and Wilson suggest that collective guilt, an necessary political device, is commonly undercut by defensiveness. The Democratic Social gathering forgot that simply as an assault on private id makes a person defensive, individuals are wont to react with defensiveness when their social identities are threatened. Calling voters racist and sexist earlier than, throughout, and after the polls, Democrats impressed a surge of defensiveness throughout a number of demographic teams.
No person Knew What Kamala Was About
Kamala Harris’s marketing campaign raised and spent extra money than Donald Trump, however what was the substance? The political messaging barely managed to flee the rhetoric of ‘Save America from Trump’. Reeling beneath excessive inflation charges, American voters felt invisible when no concrete coverage measures had been supplied for this ‘Save America’ operation. The Republicans are responsible of operating the identical banal marketing campaign, however they’d anti-incumbency on their facet. Recollections of Trump’s earlier presidency had been fading, and that helped him. Trump’s marketing campaign counted on the fickleness of public reminiscence and put its bets on individuals’s potential to neglect the previous when they’re obsessing about ongoing issues.
Crew Harris, however, weaponised recollections of the fractured American previous to make this election about correcting historic wrongs. Psychologists warn that individuals don’t essentially react nicely when confronted with problematic actions of their very own. Political scientist Eunbin Chung proposed within the context of East Asia that nationwide id affirmation could be employed “as a manner of disarming the defensiveness that’s prompted from recognising guilt of 1’s nation, permitting extra prosocial responses to emerge”. Democrats, nonetheless, fell brief in providing a optimistic spin to the American id in a bid to counter its chequered racial historical past.
Aggressive Defensiveness
Add to this the Biden administration’s no-limits assist to Israel regardless of the rising anti-war chime even inside the rank and file of the Democratic Social gathering, and we bought a recreation of aggressive defensiveness throughout. The management and the voters stopped listening to one another.
To peg this defeat as solely a misogynistic mistake, due to this fact, is oversimplifying the issues. That is how Democrats want to proceed to play the guilting recreation and not using a shred of introspection.
(Nishtha Gautam is a Delhi-based writer and tutorial.)
Disclaimer: These are the non-public opinions of the writer