Blue Owl signage outdoors the Seagram Constructing at 375 Park Avenue in New York, US, on Thursday, March 12, 2026.
Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Photos
Saba Capital Administration stated that the tender affords for shares in non-traded enterprise improvement firms managed by Blue Owl Capital and Starwood Capital got here in “beneath preliminary expectations.”
In early March, the hedge fund Saba provided liquidity to locked-up traders in Blue Owl Capital Company II (OBDC II), a non-traded private-credit fund, at a 35% low cost. It launched an identical program at Starwood Actual Property Revenue Belief (SREIT) at a 24% or 29% low cost, relying on the share class.
On Monday, Saba stated that by way of the tenders, it was capable of purchase about $10 million in combination face worth throughout 190 separate trades, “considerably all” from SREIT. The tender for Blue Owl shares reportedly did not garner greater than 1% of what was provided.
The disinterest by traders in garnering liquidity at a steep low cost comes amid 1 / 4 that noticed elevated redemptions throughout most private-credit, non-traded BDCs. Blue Owl was among the many poster youngsters of this phenomenon, halting quarterly redemptions in OBDC II in mid-February, and opting as a substitute to return capital periodically by way of portfolio asset gross sales. In early April, traders sought to redeem $5.4 billion from two of its different private-credit funds through the first quarter. Like lots of its friends, the fund supervisor opted to cap these requests at 5%.
Within the wake of the OBDC II resolution, Saba Capital’s Boaz Weinstein advised CNBC that they had been “listening to from traders in these funds that they needed their a reimbursement,” which is why the agency noticed a market alternative. As such, Saba introduced on Monday that it was “contemplating offering bids on a variety of further merchandise, together with the Cliffwater interval fund and Blue Owl’s OCIC.”
“Saba’s objective is simple: retail traders in these merchandise deserve entry to liquidity, simply as traders in public BDCs have lengthy loved,” Saba stated in an announcement. “We intend to be a constant, credible bid on this market.”
The hedge fund stated that following its public exercise in SREIT, Starwood Chairman and CEO Barry Sternlicht introduced a dedication to inject fairness capital to fund investor redemptions. Saba stated it “commends” Sternlicht for that call.
“We consider our entry into this market was a catalyst for that consequence and that every one SREIT traders have benefitted because of this,” the agency stated.
Saba stated that by way of OBDC II, the “pool of illiquid capital accessible to tender was naturally restricted” because of solely $332 million remaining within the fund. Nonetheless, the agency stated it sees credit score threat accumulating into 2027 and 2028 and believes the “alternative set for offering liquidity at scale will develop significantly.”
“Saba believes the query shouldn’t be whether or not this area will expertise vital stress, however when,” the agency stated in Monday’s assertion. “A whole bunch of billions of {dollars} of personal credit score are at present held by retail traders in merchandise that provide restricted or no secondary liquidity. Saba intends to be a constant supply of that liquidity – and to have the capital deployed and prepared when the necessity intensifies.”

