
The contracts, issued through Clarence Home, reportedly gave his family important oversight – together with pre-approval of all questions, the power to assessment and amend edits, and even the suitable to dam footage from being aired.
The revelations have resurfaced amid broader consideration on how the royal household manages its public picture, significantly following Andrew Windsor, 66, being stripped of royal titles over his hyperlinks to his pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein.
A senior media insider stated: “Inside broadcasting circles, there has lengthy been an consciousness of how tightly managed entry to King Charles may very well be, however seeing the element laid out once more has reignited debate. It underscores simply how far these preparations went in comparison with what most public figures would request.”
The supply added, “For Andrew Windsor, there’s a sense of frustration and rage that he by no means had entry to that very same stage of structured media administration. The distinction between the 2 brothers has develop into extra obvious, significantly as scrutiny round Andrew has intensified with out the identical protecting framework in place.”

