Critics on the time have been much less forgiving.
Tim Hughes, then affiliate editor of the British Journal of Pictures, described photos of Harry as “technically very poor,” whereas Professor John Hedgecoe criticized one portrait as “an absolute mess.”
The detrimental reception prolonged internationally, with many evaluations dismissing the challenge as pointless.
Sources acquainted with the episode stated the backlash has taken on new resonance amid ongoing debates about privilege and entry because the scandal over Andrew’s hyperlinks to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein rages on.
One insider informed us: “This was an early instance of a high-profile determine making an attempt to carve out a artistic profession with important institutional backing, regardless of restricted essential success.
“In hindsight, it suits right into a broader dialog about alternative – whether or not these ventures would have been potential with out the platform that got here with royal standing.”
“It is actually very near the failed nepo child initiatives the world is now seeing,” the supply added.