Pullos denied all allegations of wrongdoing within the swimsuit.
Apr. 15 2024, Revealed 11:00 a.m. ET
Cleaning soap star Haley Pullos was slapped with a second lawsuit blaming her for the April 2023 automotive crash the place she was allegedly driving beneath the affect and precipitated a person to endure severe inner accidents.
In keeping with court docket paperwork obtained by RadarOnline.com, the State of California and the Division of Transportation filed a cross-complaint in opposition to the Common Hospital star within the lawsuit introduced by Courtney Wilder.
Article continues under commercial
As we first reported, Wilder sued the actress — together with the State of California and the Division of Transportation — and the restaurant the place Pullos works a second job as a hostess.
Within the lawsuit, Wilder accused Pullos of being answerable for the nasty freeway crash. Legislation enforcement mentioned Pullos swerved, flew over the divider, and into oncoming site visitors. Pullos’ white 2019 Ford crashed headfirst into Wilder’s white 2020 Kia whereas driving 60 MPH.
Article continues under commercial
A photograph of the aftermath of the crash.
Article continues under commercial
Police needed to pull Pullos out of her automotive with the jaws of life whereas she shouted, “This can be a $400 f—— shirt” at officers, in line with the swimsuit.
The police report said marijuana edibles and mini bottles of liquor had been discovered contained in the cleaning soap star’s automotive. Pullos was taken to a hospital the place police mentioned she acquired aggressive with workers.
Article continues under commercial
A photograph of the aftermath of the crash.
MORE ON:
Common Hospital
Article continues under commercial
In his lawsuit, Wilder claimed Pullos had been ingesting at her hostess job earlier than the crash. He accused the house owners of the restaurant of encouraging Pullos to drink with prospects however not offering any transportation for her to get house.
Wilder mentioned he suffered severe inner accidents and needed to be transported to the hospital for emergency surgical procedure. His lawsuit demanded unspecified damages.
Article continues under commercial
Pullos was charged with one felony rely of DUI inflicting harm, one felony rely of driving with a .08 BAC or increased, and one misdemeanor rely of hit-and-run by the Los Angeles District Lawyer’s Workplace. She pleaded not responsible.
In his lawsuit, Wilder accused the State of California and the Division of Transportation of failing to maintain correct indicators on the freeway. He mentioned Pullos entered the unsuitable method on the 134 Freeway. He mentioned, “The indicators weren’t clear and the lanes weren’t correctly marked.”
Article continues under commercial
A photograph of the vehicles after the crash.
Article continues under commercial
Wilder mentioned the roadway was in a harmful situation on the time of the collision and performed a task within the incident. He mentioned the State of California had been notified of the difficulty however did not take motion.
Now, in response, The State of California denied all allegations of wrongdoing and filed the cross-complaint in opposition to Pullos.
Article continues under commercial
In it, legal professionals for the State of California accused Pullos of being negligent on the night time in query. They mentioned she needs to be on the hook for any judgment awarded to Wilder NOT them.
As we first reported, Pullos denied all allegations of wrongdoing. She claimed, “the damages alleged within the grievance occurred and had been proximately attributable to both the only real negligent and/or intentional conduct of Plaintiffs, which sole negligent and/or intentional conduct bars Plaintiff’s restoration, or had been contributed by Plaintiffs’ negligent and/or intentional conduct, and Plaintiffs’ restoration, if any, needs to be diminished by an quantity proportionate to the quantity by which Plaintiffs’ negligent.”
Pullos has but to answer the cross-complaint.