The Union authorities’s choice to revise the classification standards for micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), efficient April 1, has created unease amongst some consultant our bodies, who argue the revision may have an “opposed impression” on micro and small corporations.
Introduced by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in her Finances speech in February, the revision elevated the funding cap for every of the three segments by 2.5 occasions and the turnover cap by two occasions. In different phrases, some corporations that have been beforehand medium-sized at the moment are small enterprises, whereas some small corporations at the moment are micro enterprises.
In a letter to the Ministry of MSME on March 12, Laghu Udyog Bharati — a Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-affiliated physique for micro and small enterprises — flagged that with the revision, erstwhile medium corporations will “nook” advantages meant for smaller corporations, The Indian Categorical has learnt.
In India, micro and small enterprises profit from a 25 per cent public procurement quota and MSMEs total are eligible for precedence sector lending, with a sub-target for micro corporations.
“Laghu Udyog Bharati foresee the opposed impression of above enhancements on micro and small-scale items who represent about 99.99 per cent of MSMEs whereas handful of medium degree items as they’re lower than 0.01 per cent are anticipated to nook such advantages,” the letter to SCL Das, MSME Secretary, stated. “Therefore, revision of classification of MSMEs at this stage is not going to serve any helpful objective and it’s requested to revive the present standards in the intervening time,” it added.
What’s the revised standards for MSME classification
Previous to April 1, micro enterprises have been outlined as these with investments as much as Rs 1 crore and annual turnover as much as Rs 5 crore. The brink for small enterprises was Rs 10 crore in funding and Rs 50 crore in turnover, whereas for medium enterprises, it was Rs 50 crore in funding and Rs 250 crore in turnover.
In her Finances speech, Sitharaman stated the funding and turnover limits can be enhanced to offer MSMEs “the boldness to develop and generate employment for our youth”.
Story continues beneath this advert
“To assist them obtain greater efficiencies of scale, technological upgradation and higher entry to capital, the funding and turnover limits for classification of all MSMEs can be enhanced to 2.5 and a pair of occasions, respectively,” she had stated.
The latest standards revision previous to the newest change was made in 2020.
Pandemic impact
In its letter, Laghu Udyog Bharati argued that because of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, MSMEs have been adversely impacted and that their restoration could be exhausting to evaluate as of now.
“Subsequently, it might be too early to boost the extent of Funding to 2.5 occasions and to double the turnover degree for numerous classes of MSMEs and no tangible advantages might be achieved by merely revising their classification,” the letter stated.
Story continues beneath this advert
“Presumably, it might not be potential for the Govt. to correctly assess the impression of revision of classification of MSMEs undertaken throughout the yr 2020. Likely, no profit might be attributed to MSMEs as a result of change in classification standards made earlier,” it additionally stated, flagging the absence of contemporary information on MSMEs for the reason that Nationwide Pattern Survey in 2015-16.
Nevertheless, Anil Bhardwaj, secretary common of Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME), welcomed the enhancement on the grounds that periodic revision of funding and turnover limits is essential, particularly when inflation and geopolitical occasions are elevating uncooked materials prices and, in flip, the turnover of a agency.
The ‘lacking center’ and credit score woes of micro, small enterprises
Another excuse cited for the revision is to advertise vertical integration of corporations versus horizontal progress, which takes a toll on productiveness.
“In India, medium-sized enterprises are only a few. There’s a ‘lacking center’ as a result of corporations desire to remain small. One purpose is that the second they get out of the small class, they lose sure advantages. So, as a substitute of vertical progress, many broaden horizontally — organising a number of Rs 50 crore corporations as a substitute of a single Rs 200 crore vertically built-in firm. This raises prices due to extra regulatory necessities, more room getting used, extra safety guards — assets that don’t add to productiveness,” Bhardwaj stated.
Story continues beneath this advert
A 3rd purpose for the revision, based on Bhardwaj, was to considerably elevate the funding restrict, which can enable international traders exploring joint ventures in India to take a position bigger quantities whereas nonetheless qualifying as MSMEs to learn from precedence sector lending.
In its letter, Laghu Udyog Bharati highlighted that regardless of MSMEs being eligible for precedence sector lending, of which round 8 per cent is put aside for micro enterprises, most credit score flows in direction of medium enterprises.
“It’s our expertise that banking channels, be it public sector or a personal Financial institution usually keep away from micro and small items for his or her restricted credit score necessities whereas desire[ring] to cope with larger items in granting loans and different credit score amenities and so on. as they will obtain their goal by financing a restricted variety of shoppers. This reality has been dropped at the information of Ministry of Finance in addition to RBI on numerous events however with out a lot outcome,” the letter stated.
Laghu Udyog Bharati additionally requested to create a separate division for micro and small enterprises, arguing that “there’s an pressing want to guard such susceptible part of the society as they will’t compete with medium enterprises in any method”.