The case, heard over 4 days in December on the Excessive Courtroom in London, centred on jewelry, clothes and memorabilia linked to the late Amy, who died of alcohol poisoning aged 27 in 2011.
Mitch argued proceeds from the gross sales ought to have supported the charitable basis established in Amy’s reminiscence, however the courtroom dominated the objects had been legitimately gifted and offered.
Handing down judgment, Sarah Clarke KC was sharply vital of Mitch’s testimony.
She mentioned: “The proof exhibits that along with Mr Winehouse’s many good qualities, he likes to dominate folks and conditions and expects folks to do what he desires.
“As he himself admitted in proof, his reminiscence is poor, as is his capacity to precisely recall dates, instances, conversations and occasions, each on the time, but additionally a few years after they occurred.”
Clarke concluded: “In lots of respects I discovered him to be an unreliable witness.”